PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEXD.L vs. LCUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEXD.L vs. LCUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS Class B (FEXD.L) and Lyxor Core Morningstar US (DR) UCITS ETF (LCUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FEXD.L is traded in GBp, while LCUS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the LCUS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


FEXD.L

1D
-0.11%
1M
5.28%
YTD
14.06%
6M
14.03%
1Y
28.95%
3Y*
16.32%
5Y*
10.82%
10Y*
12.39%

LCUS.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEXD.L vs. LCUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FEXD.L
First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS Class B
14.06%6.55%17.43%7.00%-3.00%26.00%9.31%21.74%-3.21%
LCUS.L
Lyxor Core Morningstar US (DR) UCITS ETF
0.00%3.57%27.38%20.34%-12.04%27.36%14.33%24.68%2.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FEXD.L and LCUS.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2018

0.64

The correlation between FEXD.L and LCUS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (3 years) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEXD.L vs. LCUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEXD.L
FEXD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FEXD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEXD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEXD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FEXD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEXD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

LCUS.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEXD.L vs. LCUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS Class B (FEXD.L) and Lyxor Core Morningstar US (DR) UCITS ETF (LCUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEXD.LLCUS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.19

FEXD.L vs. LCUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEXD.LLCUS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

Drawdowns

FEXD.L vs. LCUS.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEXD.LLCUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.88%

Volatility

FEXD.L vs. LCUS.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEXD.LLCUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.76%

FEXD.L vs. LCUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEXD.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUS.L's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEXD.L vs. LCUS.L - Dividend Comparison

FEXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while LCUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FEXD.L
First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS Class B
0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%
LCUS.L
Lyxor Core Morningstar US (DR) UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.83%0.77%0.69%0.48%0.02%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEXD.L and LCUS.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCUS.L is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCUS.L is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FEXD.L.

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FEXD.L and 0.04% for LCUS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEXD.L and LCUS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer