PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FETKX vs. FALIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FETKX vs. FALIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Equity Dividend Income Fund Class K (FETKX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I (FALIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, FETKX has underperformed FALIX with an annualized return of 10.00%, while FALIX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.12% annualized return.


FETKX

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.82%
YTD
8.25%
6M
4.49%
1Y
14.01%
3Y*
13.06%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
10.00%

FALIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
12.07%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
12.39%
10Y*
14.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FETKX vs. FALIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FETKX
Fidelity Equity Dividend Income Fund Class K
8.25%7.33%12.57%11.71%-0.93%22.32%1.95%27.40%-9.22%13.32%
FALIX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I
0.00%19.65%26.36%23.49%-7.91%25.81%8.85%31.71%-8.42%16.93%

Correlation

The correlation between FETKX and FALIX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2008

0.91

Over the past year, the correlation between FETKX and FALIX has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.91, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FETKX vs. FALIX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FETKX
FALIX

Financial Services

20.2%
15.6%

Technology

15.2%
25.2%

Healthcare

12.2%
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

11.1%
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
2.9%

Energy

7.7%
8.5%

Industrials

7.6%
18.9%

Utilities

7.1%
1.1%

Communication Services

6.9%
9.9%

Real Estate

2.8%
0.7%

Basic Materials

0.8%
2.3%

Financial Services

FETKX
20.2%
FALIX
15.6%

Technology

FETKX
15.2%
FALIX
25.2%

Healthcare

FETKX
12.2%
FALIX
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

FETKX
11.1%
FALIX
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FETKX
8.3%
FALIX
2.9%

Energy

FETKX
7.7%
FALIX
8.5%

Industrials

FETKX
7.6%
FALIX
18.9%

Utilities

FETKX
7.1%
FALIX
1.1%

Communication Services

FETKX
6.9%
FALIX
9.9%

Real Estate

FETKX
2.8%
FALIX
0.7%

Basic Materials

FETKX
0.8%
FALIX
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FETKX vs. FALIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FETKX
FETKX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FETKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FETKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
FETKX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FETKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
FETKX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

FALIX
FALIX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FALIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FALIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FALIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FALIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FALIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FETKX vs. FALIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Equity Dividend Income Fund Class K (FETKX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I (FALIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FETKXFALIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.18

1.81

-0.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.58

2.54

-0.96

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.49

-0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

2.89

-0.94

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.89

4.92

+0.96

FETKX vs. FALIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FETKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the FALIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FETKX and FALIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FETKXFALIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

1.81

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.78

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.77

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.48

-0.09

Drawdowns

FETKX vs. FALIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FETKX drawdown since its inception was -56.51%, smaller than the maximum FALIX drawdown of -62.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FETKX and FALIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FETKXFALIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.51%

-62.37%

+5.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.41%

-5.03%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.22%

-18.89%

+5.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.07%

-21.48%

+5.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.14%

-37.51%

-1.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-4.17%

+3.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.53%

-13.28%

+5.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

2.78%

-0.33%

Volatility

FETKX vs. FALIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Equity Dividend Income Fund Class K (FETKX) has a higher volatility of 2.35% compared to Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I (FALIX) at 0.00%. This indicates that FETKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FALIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FETKXFALIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.35%

0.00%

+2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.44%

4.20%

+5.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.84%

8.06%

+3.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.77%

16.44%

-2.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.59%

18.58%

-1.99%

FETKX vs. FALIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FETKX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FALIX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

FETKX vs. FALIX - Dividend Comparison

FETKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than FALIX's 5.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FALIX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I
5.86%5.86%6.10%3.43%2.28%6.51%5.39%8.35%16.78%6.13%2.25%3.16%
FETKX
Fidelity Equity Dividend Income Fund Class K
1.47%1.56%8.47%5.31%7.74%11.62%2.52%8.49%14.43%9.47%6.22%6.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


FETKX and FALIX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FETKX has higher volatility (2.35%) compared to FALIX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FETKX dropped -56.51% vs FALIX's -62.37%.

FALIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FETKX and FALIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer