FESM vs. FSSNX
FESM (Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF) and FSSNX (Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past year, FESM returned 46.73% vs 41.33% for FSSNX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FESM charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for FSSNX.
Performance
FESM vs. FSSNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FESM having a 19.64% return and FSSNX slightly lower at 18.72%.
FESM
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 3.13%
- YTD
- 19.64%
- 6M
- 19.11%
- 1Y
- 46.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSSNX
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- 18.72%
- 6M
- 17.45%
- 1Y
- 41.33%
- 3Y*
- 18.75%
- 5Y*
- 6.72%
- 10Y*
- 11.22%
FESM vs. FSSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FESM Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF | 19.64% | 17.88% | 16.22% | 12.19% |
FSSNX Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund | 18.72% | 12.94% | 11.71% | 12.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between FESM and FSSNX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023 | 0.98 |
The correlation between FESM and FSSNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FESM vs. FSSNX — Risk / Return Rank
FESM
FSSNX
FESM vs. FSSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM) and Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund (FSSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FESM | FSSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.37 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.61 | 3.98 | +0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.60 | 14.13 | +2.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FESM | FSSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48 | 2.29 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.29 | 0.54 | +0.75 |
Drawdowns
FESM vs. FSSNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FESM drawdown since its inception was -26.93%, smaller than the maximum FSSNX drawdown of -41.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FESM and FSSNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FESM | FSSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.93% | -41.72% | +14.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.18% | -11.00% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.59% | -0.14% | -1.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.79% | -8.29% | +3.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 3.09% | -0.27% |
Volatility
FESM vs. FSSNX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM) and Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund (FSSNX) have volatilities of 5.64% and 5.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FESM | FSSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | 5.59% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.32% | 13.59% | -0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.98% | 19.13% | -0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.26% | 22.58% | -1.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.26% | 23.45% | -2.19% |
FESM vs. FSSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FESM has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than FSSNX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FESM vs. FSSNX - Dividend Comparison
FESM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than FSSNX's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FESM Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.08% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSSNX Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund | 0.91% | 1.08% | 1.04% | 1.43% | 1.26% | 3.92% | 0.94% | 2.96% | 4.94% | 3.37% | 2.27% | 2.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, FESM and FSSNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FESM has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to FSSNX (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FESM dropped -26.93% vs FSSNX's -41.72%.
FESM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FESM and FSSNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer