FESM vs. AFSC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FESM (Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF) and AFSC (abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FESM returned 51.65% vs 34.76% for AFSC. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FESM charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for AFSC.

Performance

FESM vs. AFSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM) and abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF (AFSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FESM having a 24.59% return and AFSC slightly lower at 24.40%.

FESM

• 1D: -0.78%
• 1M: 4.79%
• YTD: 24.59%
• 6M: 22.07%
• 1Y: 51.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AFSC

• 1D: -1.29%
• 1M: 6.74%
• YTD: 24.40%
• 6M: 19.46%
• 1Y: 34.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FESM vs. AFSC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FESM Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF	24.59%	13.80%
AFSC abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF	24.40%	2.33%

Correlation

The correlation between FESM and AFSC is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2025	0.91

The correlation between FESM and AFSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FESM vs. AFSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FESM

FESM Risk / Return Rank: 85
FESM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FESM Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FESM Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FESM Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FESM Martin Ratio Rank: 88

AFSC

AFSC Risk / Return Rank: 65
AFSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
AFSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
AFSC Omega Ratio Rank: 53
AFSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
AFSC Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FESM vs. AFSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM) and abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF (AFSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FESM	AFSC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.66	1.84	+0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.53	2.60	+0.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.31	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.10	3.40	+1.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.36	12.89	+5.46

FESM vs. AFSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FESM Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is higher than the AFSC Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FESM and AFSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FESM vs. AFSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FESM drawdown since its inception was -26.93%, which is greater than AFSC's maximum drawdown of -21.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FESM and AFSC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FESM	AFSC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.93%	-21.93%	-5.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.18%	-10.29%	+0.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.78%	-1.29%	+0.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.71%	-4.12%	-0.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.82%	2.70%	+0.12%

Volatility

FESM vs. AFSC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM) has a higher volatility of 6.38% compared to abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF (AFSC) at 5.46%. This indicates that FESM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FESM	AFSC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.38%	5.46%	+0.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.11%	14.59%	-0.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.54%	19.01%	+0.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.32%	22.51%	-1.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.32%	22.51%	-1.19%

FESM vs. AFSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FESM has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than AFSC's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

FESM vs. AFSC - Dividend Comparison

FESM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than AFSC's 0.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AFSC abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF	0.06%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%
FESM Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF	0.73%	0.82%	1.08%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FESM and AFSC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, FESM and AFSC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FESM or AFSC?

FESM has higher volatility (6.38%) compared to AFSC (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FESM dropped -26.93% vs AFSC's -21.93%.

Which ETF is better, FESM or AFSC?

On 1-year performance, FESM leads with 51.65% vs 34.76% for AFSC. On fees, FESM is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, AFSC has been the lower-risk option at 5.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FESM or AFSC?

Over the 1-year period, FESM has performed better with a 51.65% return vs 34.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FESM or AFSC?

FESM is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for AFSC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FESM or AFSC?

FESM has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.06% for AFSC.

What is the main difference between FESM and AFSC?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for FESM and 0.65% for AFSC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FESM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.