PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FESD.DE vs. UEFS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FESD.DE vs. UEFS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (FESD.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UEFS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FESD.DE achieves a 3.41% return, which is significantly lower than UEFS.DE's 3.71% return.


FESD.DE

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.35%
YTD
3.41%
6M
3.08%
1Y
9.14%
3Y*
5.13%
5Y*
1.89%
10Y*

UEFS.DE

1D
-0.03%
1M
1.91%
YTD
3.71%
6M
3.67%
1Y
11.43%
3Y*
8.56%
5Y*
3.30%
10Y*
3.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FESD.DE vs. UEFS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FESD.DE
Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF
3.41%0.21%8.73%4.67%-13.30%6.35%
UEFS.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) Dist
3.71%2.37%13.84%8.28%-14.67%6.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FESD.DE and UEFS.DE is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2021

0.76

The correlation between FESD.DE and UEFS.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (all time) to 0.86 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FESD.DE vs. UEFS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FESD.DE
FESD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FESD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FESD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
FESD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FESD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FESD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

UEFS.DE
UEFS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
UEFS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEFS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEFS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
UEFS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEFS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FESD.DE vs. UEFS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (FESD.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UEFS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FESD.DEUEFS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.38

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

3.96

-1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.56

12.59

-6.03

FESD.DE vs. UEFS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FESD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the UEFS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FESD.DE and UEFS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FESD.DEUEFS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

1.98

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.38

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.44

-0.26

Drawdowns

FESD.DE vs. UEFS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FESD.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.01%, smaller than the maximum UEFS.DE drawdown of -24.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FESD.DE and UEFS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FESD.DEUEFS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.01%

-24.26%

+8.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.71%

-2.87%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.34%

-13.70%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.01%

-17.84%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-0.03%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.16%

-7.41%

+0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

0.91%

+0.48%

Volatility

FESD.DE vs. UEFS.DE - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (FESD.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.28% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UEFS.DE) at 1.27%. This indicates that FESD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UEFS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FESD.DEUEFS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.28%

1.27%

+1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.57%

3.77%

+0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.51%

5.76%

+0.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.80%

8.69%

+0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.70%

9.37%

-0.67%

FESD.DE vs. UEFS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FESD.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than UEFS.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FESD.DE vs. UEFS.DE - Dividend Comparison

FESD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.69%, more than UEFS.DE's 6.50% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FESD.DE
Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF
6.69%5.90%5.86%5.43%4.80%2.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UEFS.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) Dist
6.50%7.96%6.14%6.46%6.08%4.22%5.09%4.60%4.53%4.90%2.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


FESD.DE and UEFS.DE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UEFS.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UEFS.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FESD.DE.

FESD.DE tracks Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond, while UEFS.DE tracks Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Sovereign & Agency 3% Country Capped. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FESD.DE and 0.25% for UEFS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FESD.DE and UEFS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer