PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FESD.DE vs. SEAD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FESD.DE vs. SEAD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (FESD.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Dist (SEAD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FESD.DE achieves a 3.41% return, which is significantly higher than SEAD.DE's 0.82% return.


FESD.DE

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.35%
YTD
3.41%
6M
3.08%
1Y
9.14%
3Y*
5.13%
5Y*
1.89%
10Y*

SEAD.DE

1D
0.15%
1M
0.13%
YTD
0.82%
6M
1.21%
1Y
4.92%
3Y*
5.77%
5Y*
0.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FESD.DE vs. SEAD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FESD.DE
Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF
3.41%0.21%8.73%4.67%-13.30%6.35%
SEAD.DE
UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Dist
0.82%7.17%4.95%5.22%-12.53%-0.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FESD.DE and SEAD.DE is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2021

0.23

The correlation between FESD.DE and SEAD.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.28 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FESD.DE vs. SEAD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FESD.DE
FESD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FESD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FESD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
FESD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FESD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FESD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

SEAD.DE
SEAD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SEAD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEAD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEAD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SEAD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEAD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FESD.DE vs. SEAD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (FESD.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Dist (SEAD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FESD.DESEAD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.34

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

2.35

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.56

9.84

-3.28

FESD.DE vs. SEAD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FESD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the SEAD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FESD.DE and SEAD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FESD.DESEAD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

1.70

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.10

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.15

+0.04

Drawdowns

FESD.DE vs. SEAD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FESD.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.01%, smaller than the maximum SEAD.DE drawdown of -18.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FESD.DE and SEAD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FESD.DESEAD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.01%

-18.40%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.71%

-2.08%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.34%

-2.40%

-9.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.01%

-18.40%

+2.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-0.36%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.16%

-6.26%

-0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

0.50%

+0.89%

Volatility

FESD.DE vs. SEAD.DE - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (FESD.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.28% compared to UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Dist (SEAD.DE) at 0.76%. This indicates that FESD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEAD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FESD.DESEAD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.28%

0.76%

+1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.57%

2.39%

+2.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.51%

2.89%

+3.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.80%

4.30%

+4.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.70%

5.33%

+3.37%

FESD.DE vs. SEAD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FESD.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SEAD.DE's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

FESD.DE vs. SEAD.DE - Dividend Comparison

FESD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.69%, more than SEAD.DE's 5.84% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
FESD.DE
Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF
6.69%5.90%5.86%5.43%4.80%2.01%0.00%
SEAD.DE
UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Dist
5.84%4.51%5.70%4.36%4.23%3.36%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


FESD.DE and SEAD.DE have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SEAD.DE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SEAD.DE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FESD.DE.

FESD.DE tracks Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond, while SEAD.DE tracks JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets Diversified 3% capped 1-5 (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FESD.DE and 0.38% for SEAD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FESD.DE and SEAD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer