FESD.DE vs. GASF.DE

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

FESD.DE (Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF) and GASF.DE (Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Inc) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - FESD.DE tracks the Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond while GASF.DE tracks the FTSE Goldman Sachs China Government Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FESD.DE returned 1.92%/yr vs 3.52%/yr for GASF.DE. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FESD.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for GASF.DE.

Performance

FESD.DE vs. GASF.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (FESD.DE) and Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Inc (GASF.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FESD.DE achieves a 5.96% return, which is significantly lower than GASF.DE's 7.95% return.

FESD.DE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.56%
• 6M: 5.20%
• YTD: 5.96%
• 1Y: 12.79%
• 3Y*: 7.38%
• 5Y*: 1.92%
• 10Y*: —

GASF.DE

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 1.40%
• 6M: 6.61%
• YTD: 7.95%
• 1Y: 8.98%
• 3Y*: 5.09%
• 5Y*: 3.52%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FESD.DE vs. GASF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FESD.DE Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF	5.96%	0.93%	9.23%	5.14%	-13.10%	-8.73%
GASF.DE Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Inc	7.95%	-6.82%	10.85%	-2.28%	0.91%	11.25%

Correlation

The correlation between FESD.DE and GASF.DE is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2021	0.47

The correlation between FESD.DE and GASF.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (5 years) to 0.58 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FESD.DE vs. GASF.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FESD.DE

FESD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 76
FESD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FESD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FESD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FESD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
FESD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 65

GASF.DE

GASF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 69
GASF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
GASF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
GASF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 72
GASF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
GASF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FESD.DE vs. GASF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (FESD.DE) and Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Inc (GASF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FESD.DE	GASF.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	1.81	+0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	2.68	+0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.34	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.46	2.84	+0.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.36	8.54	+0.83

FESD.DE vs. GASF.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FESD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the GASF.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FESD.DE and GASF.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FESD.DE vs. GASF.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FESD.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.67%, which is greater than GASF.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FESD.DE and GASF.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	FESD.DE	GASF.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.67%	-13.75%	-8.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.71%	-3.40%	-0.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.34%	-11.00%	-1.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.86%	-13.75%	-2.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.58%	-1.53%	-1.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.92%	-6.06%	-7.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.37%	1.12%	+0.25%

Volatility

FESD.DE vs. GASF.DE - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (FESD.DE) and Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Inc (GASF.DE) have volatilities of 1.54% and 1.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FESD.DE	GASF.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.54%	1.48%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.93%	3.45%	+1.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.75%	5.35%	+1.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.74%	6.68%	+2.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.61%	7.71%	+2.90%

FESD.DE vs. GASF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FESD.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than GASF.DE's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

FESD.DE vs. GASF.DE - Dividend Comparison

FESD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.70%, more than GASF.DE's 1.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FESD.DE Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF	7.70%	6.61%	6.31%	5.87%	5.06%	2.34%	0.00%
GASF.DE Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Inc	1.98%	2.36%	2.35%	2.63%	2.73%	2.40%	1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FESD.DE and GASF.DE in my portfolio?

FESD.DE and GASF.DE have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FESD.DE or GASF.DE?

On fees, GASF.DE is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FESD.DE or GASF.DE?

GASF.DE is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FESD.DE.

What is the main difference between FESD.DE and GASF.DE?

FESD.DE tracks Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond, while GASF.DE tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs China Government Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FESD.DE and 0.24% for GASF.DE.