PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEQT.NEO vs. VRIF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEQT.NEO vs. VRIF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) and Vanguard Retirement Income ETF Portfolio (VRIF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEQT.NEO achieves a 11.50% return, which is significantly higher than VRIF.TO's 5.33% return.


FEQT.NEO

1D
0.22%
1M
1.03%
YTD
11.50%
6M
10.71%
1Y
25.59%
3Y*
24.39%
5Y*
10Y*

VRIF.TO

1D
0.04%
1M
0.91%
YTD
5.33%
6M
5.10%
1Y
11.93%
3Y*
10.05%
5Y*
4.62%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEQT.NEO vs. VRIF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FEQT.NEO
Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund
11.50%19.42%29.43%17.95%-3.63%
VRIF.TO
Vanguard Retirement Income ETF Portfolio
5.33%10.60%8.42%8.96%-8.91%

Correlation

The correlation between FEQT.NEO and VRIF.TO is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2022

0.63

The correlation between FEQT.NEO and VRIF.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.81 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEQT.NEO vs. VRIF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEQT.NEO
FEQT.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FEQT.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

VRIF.TO
VRIF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VRIF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRIF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRIF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
VRIF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRIF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEQT.NEO vs. VRIF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) and Vanguard Retirement Income ETF Portfolio (VRIF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEQT.NEOVRIF.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.42

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

2.62

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.08

10.80

+2.28

FEQT.NEO vs. VRIF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEQT.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the VRIF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEQT.NEO and VRIF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEQT.NEO vs. VRIF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEQT.NEO drawdown since its inception was -15.98%, roughly equal to the maximum VRIF.TO drawdown of -16.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEQT.NEO and VRIF.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEQT.NEOVRIF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.98%

-16.19%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.31%

-4.57%

-3.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.24%

-5.01%

-8.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.96%

-0.36%

-0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.86%

-3.83%

+0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

1.11%

+0.85%

Volatility

FEQT.NEO vs. VRIF.TO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to Vanguard Retirement Income ETF Portfolio (VRIF.TO) at 1.81%. This indicates that FEQT.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRIF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEQT.NEOVRIF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

1.81%

+3.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.99%

4.83%

+5.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.97%

5.56%

+6.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.60%

6.26%

+6.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.60%

6.25%

+6.35%

FEQT.NEO vs. VRIF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEQT.NEO has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than VRIF.TO's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEQT.NEO vs. VRIF.TO - Dividend Comparison

FEQT.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than VRIF.TO's 3.71% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
FEQT.NEO
Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund
0.81%0.91%0.91%1.33%1.23%0.00%0.00%
VRIF.TO
Vanguard Retirement Income ETF Portfolio
3.71%3.77%3.94%4.32%4.72%3.86%1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEQT.NEO and VRIF.TO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VRIF.TO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VRIF.TO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FEQT.NEO.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for FEQT.NEO and 0.29% for VRIF.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEQT.NEO and VRIF.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer