PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEQT.NEO vs. VGRO.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEQT.NEO vs. VGRO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) and Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio (VGRO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FEQT.NEO having a 10.90% return and VGRO.TO slightly higher at 10.97%.


FEQT.NEO

1D
0.54%
1M
4.10%
YTD
10.90%
6M
10.77%
1Y
25.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VGRO.TO

1D
0.57%
1M
5.12%
YTD
10.97%
6M
9.68%
1Y
25.48%
3Y*
18.25%
5Y*
11.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEQT.NEO vs. VGRO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FEQT.NEO
Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund
10.90%19.42%14.08%
VGRO.TO
Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio
10.97%16.11%10.88%

Correlation

The correlation between FEQT.NEO and VGRO.TO is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2024

0.90

The correlation between FEQT.NEO and VGRO.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEQT.NEO vs. VGRO.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEQT.NEO
FEQT.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FEQT.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

VGRO.TO
VGRO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
VGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGRO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGRO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VGRO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGRO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEQT.NEO vs. VGRO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) and Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio (VGRO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEQT.NEOVGRO.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.50

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

3.65

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.53

15.92

-2.38

FEQT.NEO vs. VGRO.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEQT.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the VGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEQT.NEO and VGRO.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEQT.NEOVGRO.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

2.66

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.79

0.82

+0.97

Drawdowns

FEQT.NEO vs. VGRO.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEQT.NEO drawdown since its inception was -13.24%, smaller than the maximum VGRO.TO drawdown of -25.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEQT.NEO and VGRO.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEQT.NEOVGRO.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.24%

-25.36%

+12.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.31%

-7.01%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

0.00%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.45%

-3.41%

+1.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

1.60%

+0.31%

Volatility

FEQT.NEO vs. VGRO.TO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) has a higher volatility of 3.90% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio (VGRO.TO) at 3.18%. This indicates that FEQT.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGRO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEQT.NEOVGRO.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

3.18%

+0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.89%

7.88%

+1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.02%

9.63%

+1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.44%

10.64%

+1.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.44%

12.53%

-0.09%

FEQT.NEO vs. VGRO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEQT.NEO has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than VGRO.TO's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEQT.NEO vs. VGRO.TO - Dividend Comparison

FEQT.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than VGRO.TO's 1.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FEQT.NEO
Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund
0.82%0.91%0.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGRO.TO
Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio
1.70%1.88%2.01%2.13%2.14%1.80%1.77%2.17%2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FEQT.NEO and VGRO.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VGRO.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VGRO.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FEQT.NEO.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for FEQT.NEO and 0.20% for VGRO.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEQT.NEO and VGRO.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer