PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEQT.NEO vs. MACG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FEQT.NEO vs. MACG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) and BlackRock ESG Multi-Asset Conservative Portfolio UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (MACG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FEQT.NEO vs. MACG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Different Trading Currencies

FEQT.NEO is traded in CAD, while MACG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MACG.L values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEQT.NEO achieves a 2.46% return, which is significantly higher than MACG.L's -0.55% return.


FEQT.NEO

1D
0.23%
1M
-1.50%
YTD
2.46%
6M
3.38%
1Y
17.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MACG.L

1D
-0.28%
1M
-0.49%
YTD
-0.55%
6M
-0.46%
1Y
5.18%
3Y*
8.59%
5Y*
2.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FEQT.NEO vs. MACG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEQT.NEO has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than MACG.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FEQT.NEO vs. MACG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEQT.NEO
FEQT.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FEQT.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEQT.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

MACG.L
MACG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
MACG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MACG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
MACG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
MACG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
MACG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEQT.NEO vs. MACG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) and BlackRock ESG Multi-Asset Conservative Portfolio UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (MACG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEQT.NEOMACG.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.19

0.57

+0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.68

0.84

+0.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.11

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

1.20

+0.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.30

3.53

+3.77

FEQT.NEO vs. MACG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEQT.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the MACG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEQT.NEO and MACG.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEQT.NEOMACG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

0.57

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.38

0.36

+1.02

Correlation

The correlation between FEQT.NEO and MACG.L is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FEQT.NEO vs. MACG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FEQT.NEO nor MACG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FEQT.NEO vs. MACG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEQT.NEO drawdown since its inception was -13.24%, smaller than the maximum MACG.L drawdown of -27.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEQT.NEO and MACG.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FEQT.NEOMACG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.24%

-14.85%

+1.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.31%

-3.97%

-4.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.93%

-2.55%

-1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.50%

-4.89%

+3.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

0.84%

+1.72%

Volatility

FEQT.NEO vs. MACG.L - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) has a higher volatility of 5.60% compared to BlackRock ESG Multi-Asset Conservative Portfolio UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (MACG.L) at 3.38%. This indicates that FEQT.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MACG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FEQT.NEOMACG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.60%

3.38%

+2.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.36%

5.60%

+3.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.04%

9.13%

+5.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.26%

8.83%

+4.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.26%

8.72%

+4.54%