FEQT.NEO vs. CSBG.NEO

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) and CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF (CSBG.NEO).

FEQT.NEO and CSBG.NEO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FEQT.NEO is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Jan 20, 2022. CSBG.NEO is an actively managed fund by CIBC. It was launched on Jun 18, 2021.

Performance

FEQT.NEO vs. CSBG.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) and CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF (CSBG.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FEQT.NEO vs. CSBG.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FEQT.NEO Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund	2.46%	18.36%	13.06%
CSBG.NEO CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF	0.00%	0.00%	1.14%

Returns By Period

FEQT.NEO

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: -1.50%
• YTD: 2.46%
• 6M: 3.38%
• 1Y: 17.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSBG.NEO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 0.00%
• 3Y*: 0.80%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEQT.NEO vs. CSBG.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEQT.NEO has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than CSBG.NEO's 0.90% expense ratio.

CSBG.NEO

CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF

FEQT.NEO

Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund

Return for Risk

FEQT.NEO vs. CSBG.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEQT.NEO

FEQT.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 62
FEQT.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
FEQT.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
FEQT.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 64
FEQT.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
FEQT.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEQT.NEO vs. CSBG.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) and CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF (CSBG.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FEQT.NEO	CSBG.NEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.68	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.67	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.30	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FEQT.NEO	CSBG.NEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.19	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.38	1.10	+0.28

Correlation

The correlation between FEQT.NEO and CSBG.NEO is -0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

FEQT.NEO vs. CSBG.NEO - Dividend Comparison

Neither FEQT.NEO nor CSBG.NEO has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FEQT.NEO Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CSBG.NEO CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF	0.00%	0.00%	1.16%	1.21%	1.66%

Drawdowns

FEQT.NEO vs. CSBG.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEQT.NEO drawdown since its inception was -13.24%, which is greater than CSBG.NEO's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEQT.NEO and CSBG.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEQT.NEO	CSBG.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.24%	0.00%	-13.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.31%	0.00%	-8.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.93%	0.00%	-3.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.50%	0.00%	-1.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.56%	0.00%	+2.56%

Volatility

FEQT.NEO vs. CSBG.NEO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO) has a higher volatility of 5.60% compared to CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF (CSBG.NEO) at 0.00%. This indicates that FEQT.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSBG.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEQT.NEO	CSBG.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.60%	0.00%	+5.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.36%	0.00%	+9.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.04%	0.00%	+15.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.26%	1.30%	+11.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.26%	1.30%	+11.96%