FEPI vs. GOF
FEPI (REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF) and GOF (Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund) are both funds - FEPI is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by REX, while GOF is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Guggenheim. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FEPI returned 33.15% vs -12.09% for GOF. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FEPI charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.62%/yr for GOF.
Performance
FEPI vs. GOF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEPI achieves a 10.42% return, which is significantly higher than GOF's -7.43% return.
FEPI
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- 10.42%
- 6M
- 11.37%
- 1Y
- 33.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOF
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -1.68%
- YTD
- -7.43%
- 6M
- -0.14%
- 1Y
- -12.09%
- 3Y*
- 3.15%
- 5Y*
- 0.93%
- 10Y*
- 7.99%
FEPI vs. GOF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FEPI REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF | 10.42% | 18.33% | 15.69% | 11.70% |
GOF Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund | -7.43% | -1.92% | 38.04% | -5.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEPI and GOF is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2023 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEPI vs. GOF — Risk / Return Rank
FEPI
GOF
FEPI vs. GOF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF (FEPI) and Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEPI | GOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 0.88 | +0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | -0.52 | +3.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.66 | -0.99 | +9.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEPI | GOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | -0.68 | +2.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.16 | 0.42 | +0.74 |
Drawdowns
FEPI vs. GOF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEPI drawdown since its inception was -23.56%, smaller than the maximum GOF drawdown of -54.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEPI and GOF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEPI | GOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.56% | -54.66% | +31.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.91% | -23.24% | +10.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.45% | -17.55% | +16.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -7.06% | +3.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.84% | 12.18% | -8.34% |
Volatility
FEPI vs. GOF - Volatility Comparison
REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF (FEPI) and Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF) have volatilities of 3.31% and 3.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEPI | GOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.31% | 3.30% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.58% | 10.88% | +1.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.54% | 17.92% | -1.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.02% | 18.19% | +0.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.02% | 19.52% | -0.50% |
FEPI vs. GOF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEPI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than GOF's 1.62% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEPI vs. GOF - Dividend Comparison
FEPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.92%, more than GOF's 19.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEPI REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF | 23.92% | 25.48% | 27.18% | 4.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GOF Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund | 19.79% | 16.97% | 14.32% | 17.07% | 14.36% | 11.93% | 11.26% | 12.08% | 11.96% | 10.13% | 11.13% | 12.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEPI and GOF have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEPI has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to GOF (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEPI dropped -23.56% vs GOF's -54.66%.
FEPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEPI and GOF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer