FEPG.L vs. PLTI.L
FEPG.L (REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF) and PLTI.L (IncomeShares Palantir (PLTR) Options ETP) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEPG.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PLTI.L.
Performance
FEPG.L vs. PLTI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEPG.L achieves a -3.44% return, which is significantly higher than PLTI.L's -33.06% return.
FEPG.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.73%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- -3.44%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
PLTI.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- 6M
- -32.21%
- YTD
- -33.06%
- 1Y
- -35.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6,217.92%
FEPG.L vs. PLTI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FEPG.L REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF | -3.44% | 8.72% |
PLTI.L IncomeShares Palantir (PLTR) Options ETP | -33.06% | -7.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEPG.L and PLTI.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2025 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEPG.L vs. PLTI.L — Risk / Return Rank
FEPG.L
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PLTI.L
FEPG.L vs. PLTI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF (FEPG.L) and IncomeShares Palantir (PLTR) Options ETP (PLTI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FEPG.L | PLTI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.92 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.60 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.92 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FEPG.L vs. PLTI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEPG.L drawdown since its inception was -35.75%, smaller than the maximum PLTI.L drawdown of -59.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEPG.L and PLTI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEPG.L | PLTI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.75% | -59.14% | +23.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -59.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.16% | -55.25% | +27.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.83% | -33.04% | +12.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 38.56% | — |
Volatility
FEPG.L vs. PLTI.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEPG.L | PLTI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 32.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.69% | 62.73% | -17.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.69% | 9,849.70% | -9,804.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.69% | 9,849.70% | -9,804.01% |
FEPG.L vs. PLTI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEPG.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTI.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEPG.L vs. PLTI.L - Dividend Comparison
FEPG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.80%, less than PLTI.L's 58.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FEPG.L REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF | 27.80% | 11.50% |
PLTI.L IncomeShares Palantir (PLTR) Options ETP | 58.06% | 11.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEPG.L and PLTI.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PLTI.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PLTI.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FEPG.L.
They also come from different issuers: HANetf and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FEPG.L and 0.55% for PLTI.L.
Find the right allocation for FEPG.L and PLTI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer