FEMVX vs. GMAQX
FEMVX (Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund) and GMAQX (GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 3 years, FEMVX returned 31.02%/yr vs 34.94%/yr for GMAQX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FEMVX charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for GMAQX.
Performance
FEMVX vs. GMAQX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEMVX achieves a 37.35% return, which is significantly lower than GMAQX's 57.96% return.
FEMVX
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- 14.17%
- YTD
- 37.35%
- 6M
- 41.22%
- 1Y
- 70.43%
- 3Y*
- 31.02%
- 5Y*
- 13.63%
- 10Y*
- —
GMAQX
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 28.51%
- YTD
- 57.96%
- 6M
- 64.09%
- 1Y
- 93.54%
- 3Y*
- 34.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FEMVX vs. GMAQX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMVX Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund | 37.35% | 33.95% | 11.68% | 17.43% | -16.98% | -1.80% |
GMAQX GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | 57.96% | 32.09% | 0.62% | 27.41% | -32.38% | 0.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEMVX and GMAQX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2021 | 0.86 |
The correlation between FEMVX and GMAQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEMVX vs. GMAQX — Risk / Return Rank
FEMVX
GMAQX
FEMVX vs. GMAQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund (FEMVX) and GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEMVX | GMAQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.78 | 1.94 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.85 | 6.82 | -0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.12 | 26.25 | -3.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEMVX | GMAQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.20 | 4.51 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.20 | 0.81 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
FEMVX vs. GMAQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEMVX drawdown since its inception was -30.54%, smaller than the maximum GMAQX drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMVX and GMAQX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEMVX | GMAQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.54% | -41.97% | +11.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.20% | -13.77% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.64% | -19.64% | +4.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.68% | -16.74% | +9.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 3.57% | -0.49% |
Volatility
FEMVX vs. GMAQX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund (FEMVX) is 7.21%, while GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GMAQX) has a volatility of 12.47%. This indicates that FEMVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMAQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEMVX | GMAQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.21% | 12.47% | -5.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.62% | 18.53% | -3.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.02% | 20.81% | -3.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.75% | 17.22% | -1.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.01% | 17.22% | -1.21% |
FEMVX vs. GMAQX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEMVX has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than GMAQX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEMVX vs. GMAQX - Dividend Comparison
FEMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, less than GMAQX's 5.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMVX Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Value Index Fund | 2.89% | 3.97% | 3.65% | 4.73% | 4.87% | 5.00% |
GMAQX GMO Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | 5.97% | 9.43% | 32.28% | 6.76% | 4.94% | 0.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEMVX and GMAQX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GMAQX has higher volatility (12.47%) compared to FEMVX (7.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEMVX dropped -30.54% vs GMAQX's -41.97%.
GMAQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.51 vs 4.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEMVX and GMAQX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer