PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEMU.L vs. EMDV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEMU.L vs. EMDV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation (FEMU.L) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (EMDV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FEMU.L is traded in USD, while EMDV.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the EMDV.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEMU.L achieves a 15.81% return, which is significantly higher than EMDV.L's 7.05% return. Over the past 10 years, FEMU.L has outperformed EMDV.L with an annualized return of 8.14%, while EMDV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 5.96% annualized return.


FEMU.L

1D
0.66%
1M
-3.00%
6M
10.14%
YTD
15.81%
1Y
31.69%
3Y*
16.05%
5Y*
7.12%
10Y*
8.14%

EMDV.L

1D
1.22%
1M
0.28%
6M
3.47%
YTD
7.05%
1Y
9.07%
3Y*
12.05%
5Y*
6.29%
10Y*
5.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEMU.L vs. EMDV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEMU.L
First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation
15.81%27.57%3.49%10.14%-13.81%7.06%-0.52%18.78%-14.90%38.13%
EMDV.L
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist)
7.05%19.28%14.38%4.54%-8.97%-0.72%-2.21%11.69%-6.30%27.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FEMU.L and EMDV.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2013

0.74

The correlation between FEMU.L and EMDV.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEMU.L vs. EMDV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEMU.L
FEMU.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FEMU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEMU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEMU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FEMU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEMU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

EMDV.L
EMDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
EMDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
EMDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEMU.L vs. EMDV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation (FEMU.L) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (EMDV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEMU.LEMDV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.13

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.13

0.91

+3.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.36

2.15

+8.21

FEMU.L vs. EMDV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEMU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the EMDV.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEMU.L and EMDV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEMU.L vs. EMDV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEMU.L drawdown since its inception was -45.58%, smaller than the maximum EMDV.L drawdown of -65.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMU.L and EMDV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEMU.LEMDV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.58%

-65.26%

+19.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.64%

-9.93%

+2.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.61%

-14.87%

-2.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.08%

-28.44%

-2.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.58%

-42.90%

-2.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.88%

-15.45%

+10.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.39%

-40.58%

+28.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

4.21%

-1.16%

Volatility

FEMU.L vs. EMDV.L - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation (FEMU.L) has a higher volatility of 7.82% compared to SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (EMDV.L) at 3.43%. This indicates that FEMU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMDV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEMU.LEMDV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.82%

3.43%

+4.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.32%

10.20%

+6.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.61%

12.67%

+6.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.31%

16.85%

+2.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.52%

18.18%

+2.34%

Dividends

FEMU.L vs. EMDV.L - Dividend Comparison

FEMU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMDV.L
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist)
3.79%3.90%4.07%4.99%4.45%3.28%3.19%3.83%3.49%2.89%4.15%5.95%
FEMU.L
First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEMU.L and EMDV.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEMU.L tracks First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Class A Accumulation, while EMDV.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEMU.L and EMDV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer