FEMSX vs. KF
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX) and The Korea Fund Inc (KF).
FEMSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 9, 2008. KF is managed by Allianz Global Investors. It was launched on Aug 29, 1984.
Performance
FEMSX vs. KF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FEMSX vs. KF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMSX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund | 6.49% | 37.92% | 7.84% | 14.23% | -23.95% | -5.14% | 24.72% | 28.87% | -16.20% | 49.92% |
KF The Korea Fund Inc | 22.80% | 99.36% | -19.29% | 12.34% | -30.02% | 8.44% | 37.14% | 6.83% | -19.26% | 42.50% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEMSX achieves a 6.49% return, which is significantly lower than KF's 22.80% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FEMSX having a 10.99% annualized return and KF not far ahead at 11.07%.
FEMSX
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -2.60%
- YTD
- 6.49%
- 6M
- 10.96%
- 1Y
- 40.14%
- 3Y*
- 19.72%
- 5Y*
- 4.56%
- 10Y*
- 10.99%
KF
- 1D
- -2.67%
- 1M
- -9.83%
- YTD
- 22.80%
- 6M
- 44.02%
- 1Y
- 123.51%
- 3Y*
- 28.50%
- 5Y*
- 9.14%
- 10Y*
- 11.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FEMSX vs. KF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEMSX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than KF's 0.02% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FEMSX vs. KF — Risk / Return Rank
FEMSX
KF
FEMSX vs. KF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX) and The Korea Fund Inc (KF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEMSX | KF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.11 | 3.70 | -1.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.72 | 3.92 | -1.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.57 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | 4.87 | -1.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.86 | 20.23 | -8.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEMSX | KF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 3.70 | -1.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.37 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.45 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.06 | +0.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between FEMSX and KF is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FEMSX vs. KF - Dividend Comparison
FEMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, more than KF's 0.98% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMSX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund | 2.30% | 2.45% | 2.08% | 2.82% | 2.39% | 12.83% | 2.99% | 2.48% | 9.42% | 8.98% | 1.46% | 1.27% |
KF The Korea Fund Inc | 0.98% | 1.20% | 2.46% | 0.00% | 15.93% | 26.50% | 1.30% | 0.24% | 18.67% | 9.75% | 1.03% | 13.66% |
Drawdowns
FEMSX vs. KF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEMSX drawdown since its inception was -44.16%, smaller than the maximum KF drawdown of -94.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMSX and KF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEMSX | KF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.16% | -94.60% | +50.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.42% | -25.42% | +12.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.64% | -47.62% | +5.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.16% | -52.91% | +8.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.45% | -60.48% | +51.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.52% | -60.91% | +47.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.45% | 6.12% | -2.67% |
Volatility
FEMSX vs. KF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX) is 9.27%, while The Korea Fund Inc (KF) has a volatility of 17.51%. This indicates that FEMSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FEMSX | KF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.27% | 17.51% | -8.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.76% | 28.39% | -13.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.17% | 33.59% | -14.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.64% | 25.02% | -6.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.13% | 24.62% | -5.49% |