FEMKX vs. VEMBX
FEMKX (Fidelity Emerging Markets) and VEMBX (Vanguard Emerging Markets Bond Fund Investor Shares) are both mutual funds - FEMKX is a Emerging Markets Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while VEMBX is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by Vanguard. Over the past 5 years, FEMKX returned 6.89%/yr vs 4.21%/yr for VEMBX. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FEMKX charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for VEMBX.
Performance
FEMKX vs. VEMBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEMKX achieves a 26.35% return, which is significantly higher than VEMBX's 2.50% return.
FEMKX
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- 6.92%
- YTD
- 26.35%
- 6M
- 28.63%
- 1Y
- 54.32%
- 3Y*
- 23.18%
- 5Y*
- 6.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.20%
VEMBX
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 2.50%
- 6M
- 3.19%
- 1Y
- 12.48%
- 3Y*
- 11.57%
- 5Y*
- 4.21%
- 10Y*
- —
FEMKX vs. VEMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMKX Fidelity Emerging Markets | 26.35% | 31.02% | 7.12% | 15.16% | -27.48% | 1.25% | 32.56% | 33.67% | -18.03% | 46.07% |
VEMBX Vanguard Emerging Markets Bond Fund Investor Shares | 2.50% | 14.32% | 7.38% | 13.66% | -13.18% | -1.53% | 14.99% | 17.72% | -0.89% | 13.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEMKX and VEMBX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEMKX vs. VEMBX — Risk / Return Rank
FEMKX
VEMBX
FEMKX vs. VEMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets (FEMKX) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Bond Fund Investor Shares (VEMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEMKX | VEMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.62 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.34 | 3.51 | +0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.43 | 15.48 | +0.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEMKX | VEMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.97 | 3.02 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.67 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 1.07 | -0.74 |
Drawdowns
FEMKX vs. VEMBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEMKX drawdown since its inception was -71.14%, which is greater than VEMBX's maximum drawdown of -24.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMKX and VEMBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEMKX | VEMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.14% | -24.36% | -46.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.00% | -3.77% | -9.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.13% | -5.56% | -13.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.88% | -24.36% | -16.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.45% | -0.28% | -1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.94% | -3.87% | -22.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.43% | 0.85% | +2.58% |
Volatility
FEMKX vs. VEMBX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Emerging Markets (FEMKX) has a higher volatility of 8.10% compared to Vanguard Emerging Markets Bond Fund Investor Shares (VEMBX) at 1.45%. This indicates that FEMKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEMKX | VEMBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.10% | 1.45% | +6.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.16% | 3.58% | +12.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.97% | 4.38% | +14.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.91% | 6.36% | +12.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.68% | 6.36% | +12.32% |
FEMKX vs. VEMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEMKX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than VEMBX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEMKX vs. VEMBX - Dividend Comparison
FEMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than VEMBX's 6.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMKX Fidelity Emerging Markets | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.65% | 1.11% | 0.77% | 6.00% | 1.39% | 1.71% | 0.83% | 0.08% | 0.67% | 0.51% |
VEMBX Vanguard Emerging Markets Bond Fund Investor Shares | 6.02% | 6.20% | 6.86% | 7.06% | 5.43% | 5.00% | 4.50% | 6.27% | 4.81% | 6.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEMKX and VEMBX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEMKX has higher volatility (8.10%) compared to VEMBX (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEMKX dropped -71.14% vs VEMBX's -24.36%.
VEMBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEMKX and VEMBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer