PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEMKX vs. FERGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEMKX vs. FERGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund (FEMKX) and Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Index Fund (FERGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEMKX achieves a 13.92% return, which is significantly lower than FERGX's 16.06% return.


FEMKX

1D
3.84%
1M
-4.46%
6M
6.75%
YTD
13.92%
1Y
33.30%
3Y*
16.57%
5Y*
6.05%
10Y*
10.42%
ALL TIME*
6.18%

FERGX

1D
4.02%
1M
-3.54%
6M
7.29%
YTD
16.06%
1Y
33.70%
3Y*
17.54%
5Y*
6.96%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FEMKX vs. FERGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEMKX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund
13.92%31.02%7.12%15.16%-27.48%1.25%32.56%33.67%-18.03%46.92%
FERGX
Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Index Fund
16.06%33.86%6.59%9.41%-20.19%-3.05%17.46%18.22%-14.52%33.62%

Correlation

The correlation between FEMKX and FERGX is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.95

The correlation between FEMKX and FERGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEMKX vs. FERGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FEMKX
FEMKX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FEMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FEMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

FERGX
FERGX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FERGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FERGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FERGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FERGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FERGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FEMKX vs. FERGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund (FEMKX) and Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Index Fund (FERGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEMKXFERGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.27

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

2.28

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.75

7.27

-0.52

FEMKX vs. FERGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEMKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the FERGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEMKX and FERGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEMKX vs. FERGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEMKX drawdown since its inception was -71.14%, which is greater than FERGX's maximum drawdown of -39.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMKX and FERGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEMKXFERGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.14%

-39.27%

-31.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.94%

-14.00%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.13%

-16.20%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.49%

-34.56%

-5.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.68%

-10.54%

-1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.86%

-14.19%

-11.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.56%

4.37%

+0.19%

Volatility

FEMKX vs. FERGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund (FEMKX) and Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Index Fund (FERGX) have volatilities of 9.59% and 9.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEMKXFERGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.59%

9.51%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.93%

20.94%

+0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.08%

22.79%

+1.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.96%

18.25%

+1.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.18%

18.46%

+0.72%

FEMKX vs. FERGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEMKX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than FERGX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEMKX vs. FERGX - Dividend Comparison

FEMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than FERGX's 2.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEMKX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund
0.04%0.05%0.65%1.11%0.77%6.00%1.39%1.71%0.83%0.08%0.67%0.51%
FERGX
Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Index Fund
2.30%2.67%2.40%2.67%2.51%2.90%1.49%2.49%2.58%0.58%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FEMKX and FERGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FEMKX has higher volatility (9.59%) compared to FERGX (9.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEMKX dropped -71.14% vs FERGX's -39.27%.

FERGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEMKX and FERGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer