PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEMG vs. GPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEMG vs. GPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FEMG

1D
0.82%
1M
1.31%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GPIX

1D
-0.07%
1M
-0.85%
YTD
7.91%
6M
6.94%
1Y
20.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEMG vs. GPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FEMG and GPIX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2026

0.76

FEMG vs. GPIX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEMG
GPIX

Industrials

27.7%
7.7%

Technology

22.4%
39.2%

Consumer Cyclical

18.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

12.1%
8.3%

Financial Services

6.5%
10.9%

Energy

3.7%
3.2%

Utilities

2.7%
2.2%

Communication Services

2.7%
10.7%

Consumer Defensive

1.7%
4.4%

Real Estate

1.6%
1.8%

Basic Materials

0.6%
1.7%

Industrials

FEMG
27.7%
GPIX
7.7%

Technology

FEMG
22.4%
GPIX
39.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FEMG
18.1%
GPIX
10.1%

Healthcare

FEMG
12.1%
GPIX
8.3%

Financial Services

FEMG
6.5%
GPIX
10.9%

Energy

FEMG
3.7%
GPIX
3.2%

Utilities

FEMG
2.7%
GPIX
2.2%

Communication Services

FEMG
2.7%
GPIX
10.7%

Consumer Defensive

FEMG
1.7%
GPIX
4.4%

Real Estate

FEMG
1.6%
GPIX
1.8%

Basic Materials

FEMG
0.6%
GPIX
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEMG vs. GPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEMG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


GPIX
GPIX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
GPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
GPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEMG vs. GPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEMGGPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.20

FEMG vs. GPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEMG vs. GPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEMG drawdown since its inception was -4.66%, smaller than the maximum GPIX drawdown of -17.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMG and GPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEMGGPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.66%

-17.50%

+12.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.89%

-2.29%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.37%

-1.48%

+0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

Volatility

FEMG vs. GPIX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEMGGPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.54%

10.79%

+5.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.54%

13.88%

+2.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.54%

13.88%

+2.66%

FEMG vs. GPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEMG has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than GPIX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEMG vs. GPIX - Dividend Comparison

FEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than GPIX's 8.14% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
FEMG
Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF
0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
8.14%8.01%7.45%1.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEMG and GPIX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FEMG is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FEMG is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for GPIX.

GPIX has the higher dividend yield at 8.14%, compared with 0.10% for FEMG.

FEMG is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while GPIX is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for FEMG and 0.29% for GPIX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEMG and GPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer