FEM.L vs. BLOK.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc (FEM.L) and First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF (BLOK.L).

FEM.L and BLOK.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FEM.L is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Apr 9, 2013. BLOK.L is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Apr 9, 2018. Both FEM.L and BLOK.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

FEM.L vs. BLOK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc (FEM.L) and First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF (BLOK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FEM.L vs. BLOK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FEM.L First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc	11.44%	18.46%	5.12%	4.21%	-3.80%	8.72%	-3.95%	15.10%	-10.36%
BLOK.L First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF	-0.94%	22.34%	18.56%	14.77%	-8.98%	19.08%	15.05%	22.59%	-0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEM.L achieves a 11.44% return, which is significantly higher than BLOK.L's -0.94% return.

FEM.L

• 1D: 2.05%
• 1M: -2.65%
• YTD: 11.44%
• 6M: 14.12%
• 1Y: 30.88%
• 3Y*: 14.03%
• 5Y*: 7.63%
• 10Y*: 9.02%

BLOK.L

• 1D: 1.82%
• 1M: -2.65%
• YTD: -0.94%
• 6M: 5.70%
• 1Y: 18.56%
• 3Y*: 16.31%
• 5Y*: 10.92%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEM.L vs. BLOK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEM.L has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BLOK.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

FEM.L

First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc

BLOK.L

First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

FEM.L vs. BLOK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEM.L

FEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 87
FEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 84
FEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 89

BLOK.L

BLOK.L Risk / Return Rank: 71
BLOK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
BLOK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
BLOK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 63
BLOK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
BLOK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEM.L vs. BLOK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc (FEM.L) and First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF (BLOK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FEM.L	BLOK.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	1.24	+0.61
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.31	1.68	+0.63
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.24	+0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.45	2.57	+0.88
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.64	8.75	+3.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FEM.L vs. BLOK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the BLOK.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEM.L and BLOK.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FEM.L	BLOK.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.85	1.24	+0.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	0.79	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.76	-0.44

Correlation

The correlation between FEM.L and BLOK.L is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FEM.L vs. BLOK.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FEM.L nor BLOK.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FEM.L vs. BLOK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEM.L drawdown since its inception was -35.42%, which is greater than BLOK.L's maximum drawdown of -26.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEM.L and BLOK.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEM.L	BLOK.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.42%	-26.23%	-9.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.09%	-10.77%	-0.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.83%	-16.43%	-1.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.65%	-4.36%	+1.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.09%	-4.34%	-4.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.50%	2.18%	+0.32%

Volatility

FEM.L vs. BLOK.L - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX UCITS ETF Acc (FEM.L) has a higher volatility of 5.83% compared to First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF (BLOK.L) at 4.53%. This indicates that FEM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLOK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEM.L	BLOK.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.83%	4.53%	+1.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.58%	9.86%	+2.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.63%	14.97%	+1.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.89%	13.82%	+2.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.71%	16.20%	+2.51%