FELCX vs. FIKHX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FELCX (Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C) and FIKHX (Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z) are both Technology Equities funds from Fidelity. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FELCX charges 1.76%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FIKHX.

Performance

FELCX vs. FIKHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C (FELCX) and Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z (FIKHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FELCX

• 1D: 6.40%
• 1M: 26.11%
• YTD: 84.21%
• 6M: 81.97%
• 1Y: 167.52%
• 3Y*: 62.30%
• 5Y*: 42.49%
• 10Y*: 36.19%

FIKHX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FELCX vs. FIKHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FELCX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C	84.21%	43.80%	42.66%	73.83%	-35.56%	56.29%	42.50%	62.54%	-11.40%
FIKHX Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z	0.00%	24.77%	35.52%	59.89%	-35.93%	27.74%	64.56%	51.18%	-17.39%

Correlation

The correlation between FELCX and FIKHX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018	0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between FELCX and FIKHX has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FELCX vs. FIKHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FELCX	FIKHX
Technology	100.0%	97.9%
Basic Materials	-	0.0%
Communication Services	-	0.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	1.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FELCX vs. FIKHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FELCX

FELCX Risk / Return Rank: 97
FELCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FELCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FELCX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
FELCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
FELCX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FELCX vs. FIKHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C (FELCX) and Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z (FIKHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FELCX	FIKHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	5.43	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.28	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.72	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	11.99	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	46.62	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FELCX	FIKHX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.43	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.05	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FELCX	FIKHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.55%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.53%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.47%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.57%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.78%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FELCX	FIKHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.91%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.31%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.52%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.34%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.70%	—	—

FELCX vs. FIKHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FELCX has a 1.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKHX's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

FELCX vs. FIKHX - Dividend Comparison

FELCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, less than FIKHX's 9.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FELCX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C	4.53%	8.35%	8.97%	4.24%	4.07%	4.95%	5.13%	0.93%	22.41%	10.39%	0.14%	11.27%
FIKHX Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z	9.85%	9.85%	7.33%	3.86%	3.32%	11.52%	7.42%	2.64%	22.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FELCX and FIKHX in my portfolio?

FELCX and FIKHX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.