PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FELCX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FELCX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C (FELCX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FELCX achieves a 84.21% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's 7.76% return. Over the past 10 years, FELCX has outperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 36.19%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively lower 17.43% annualized return.


FELCX

1D
6.40%
1M
26.11%
YTD
84.21%
6M
81.97%
1Y
167.52%
3Y*
62.30%
5Y*
42.49%
10Y*
36.19%

FCNTX

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.65%
YTD
7.76%
6M
10.05%
1Y
23.72%
3Y*
26.93%
5Y*
15.12%
10Y*
17.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FELCX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FELCX
Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C
84.21%43.80%42.66%73.83%-35.56%56.29%42.50%62.54%-13.48%33.04%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
7.76%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FELCX and FCNTX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2000

0.75

The correlation between FELCX and FCNTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FELCX vs. FCNTX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FELCX
FCNTX

Technology

100.0%
27.0%

Basic Materials

-

2.1%

Communication Services

-

21.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.7%

Energy

-

3.6%

Financial Services

-

13.8%

Healthcare

-

9.2%

Industrials

-

8.6%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

0.5%

Technology

FELCX
100.0%
FCNTX
27.0%

Basic Materials

FELCX

-

FCNTX
2.1%

Communication Services

FELCX

-

FCNTX
21.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FELCX

-

FCNTX
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

FELCX

-

FCNTX
3.7%

Energy

FELCX

-

FCNTX
3.6%

Financial Services

FELCX

-

FCNTX
13.8%

Healthcare

FELCX

-

FCNTX
9.2%

Industrials

FELCX

-

FCNTX
8.6%

Real Estate

FELCX

-

FCNTX
0.1%

Utilities

FELCX

-

FCNTX
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FELCX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FELCX
FELCX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FELCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FELCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FELCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FELCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FELCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FELCX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C (FELCX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FELCXFCNTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

5.43

1.72

+3.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.28

2.39

+2.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.72

1.31

+0.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

11.99

2.13

+9.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

46.62

9.04

+37.58

FELCX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FELCX Sharpe Ratio is 5.43, which is higher than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FELCX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FELCXFCNTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.43

1.72

+3.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.11

0.79

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.05

0.89

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.78

-0.33

Drawdowns

FELCX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FELCX drawdown since its inception was -72.55%, which is greater than FCNTX's maximum drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FELCX and FCNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FELCXFCNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.55%

-49.19%

-23.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.71%

-11.30%

-3.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.53%

-19.75%

-16.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.47%

-32.59%

-13.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.47%

-32.59%

-13.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.53%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.57%

-8.16%

-15.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.78%

2.65%

+1.13%

Volatility

FELCX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C (FELCX) has a higher volatility of 11.91% compared to Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) at 3.26%. This indicates that FELCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FELCXFCNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.91%

3.26%

+8.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.31%

10.48%

+14.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.52%

14.03%

+18.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.34%

19.15%

+19.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.70%

19.68%

+15.02%

FELCX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FELCX has a 1.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FELCX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FELCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, more than FCNTX's 4.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.33%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%
FELCX
Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class C
4.53%8.35%8.97%4.24%4.07%4.95%5.13%0.93%22.41%10.39%0.14%11.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


FELCX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FELCX has higher volatility (11.91%) compared to FCNTX (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FELCX dropped -72.55% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

FELCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.43 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FELCX and FCNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer