PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FELC vs. FEMR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FELC vs. FEMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC) and Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF (FEMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FELC achieves a 8.58% return, which is significantly lower than FEMR's 28.36% return.


FELC

1D
1.87%
1M
0.32%
YTD
8.58%
6M
7.95%
1Y
24.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FEMR

1D
4.37%
1M
3.36%
YTD
28.36%
6M
31.26%
1Y
51.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FELC vs. FEMR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FELC
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
8.58%17.09%-0.14%
FEMR
Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF
28.36%35.27%-1.48%

Correlation

The correlation between FELC and FEMR is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2024

0.65

The correlation between FELC and FEMR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FELC vs. FEMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FELC
FELC Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FELC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FELC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FELC Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FELC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FELC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FEMR
FEMR Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FEMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEMR Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FEMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEMR Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FELC vs. FEMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC) and Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF (FEMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FELCFEMRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.43

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

3.56

-0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.22

13.67

-1.45

FELC vs. FEMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FELC Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the FEMR Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FELC and FEMR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FELC vs. FEMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FELC drawdown since its inception was -18.59%, which is greater than FEMR's maximum drawdown of -15.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FELC and FEMR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FELCFEMRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.59%

-15.58%

-3.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.09%

-14.47%

+5.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.96%

-5.11%

+2.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.91%

-2.37%

+0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

3.77%

-1.76%

Volatility

FELC vs. FEMR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC) is 4.53%, while Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF (FEMR) has a volatility of 11.21%. This indicates that FELC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FELCFEMRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.53%

11.21%

-6.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.70%

20.51%

-10.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.45%

22.82%

-10.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.27%

22.20%

-6.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.27%

22.20%

-6.93%

FELC vs. FEMR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FELC has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FEMR's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

FELC vs. FEMR - Dividend Comparison

FELC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than FEMR's 1.46% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
FELC
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
0.87%0.92%1.03%0.04%
FEMR
Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF
1.46%1.92%0.37%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FELC and FEMR have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEMR has higher volatility (11.21%) compared to FELC (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FELC dropped -18.59% vs FEMR's -15.58%.

On 1-year performance, FEMR leads with 51.33% vs 24.50% for FELC. On fees, FELC is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, FELC has been the lower-risk option at 4.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FEMR has performed better with a 51.33% return vs 24.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FELC is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for FEMR.

FEMR has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 0.87% for FELC.

FELC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FEMR is Emerging Markets Diversified. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FELC and 0.38% for FEMR.

FEMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FELC and FEMR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer