PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEDDX vs. DEMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEDDX vs. DEMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Emerging Markets Discovery Fund (FEDDX) and Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class A (DEMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEDDX achieves a 21.51% return, which is significantly lower than DEMAX's 87.41% return. Over the past 10 years, FEDDX has underperformed DEMAX with an annualized return of 10.10%, while DEMAX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.76% annualized return.


FEDDX

1D
2.06%
1M
0.04%
6M
11.20%
YTD
21.51%
1Y
35.62%
3Y*
17.58%
5Y*
8.99%
10Y*
10.10%
ALL TIME*
8.46%

DEMAX

1D
4.37%
1M
-12.19%
6M
49.74%
YTD
87.41%
1Y
177.76%
3Y*
57.97%
5Y*
25.01%
10Y*
18.76%
ALL TIME*
10.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FEDDX vs. DEMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEDDX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Discovery Fund
21.51%31.90%-3.68%20.76%-11.83%6.65%16.96%19.60%-18.90%36.59%
DEMAX
Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class A
87.41%86.33%6.25%17.34%-28.85%-2.32%25.54%24.05%-17.32%41.62%

Correlation

The correlation between FEDDX and DEMAX is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2011

0.81

The correlation between FEDDX and DEMAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEDDX vs. DEMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FEDDX
FEDDX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FEDDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEDDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEDDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FEDDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEDDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

DEMAX
DEMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
DEMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DEMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FEDDX vs. DEMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets Discovery Fund (FEDDX) and Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class A (DEMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEDDXDEMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.49

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.85

4.96

-1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.01

19.67

-6.66

FEDDX vs. DEMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEDDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the DEMAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEDDX and DEMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEDDX vs. DEMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEDDX drawdown since its inception was -42.95%, smaller than the maximum DEMAX drawdown of -63.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEDDX and DEMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEDDXDEMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.95%

-63.23%

+20.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.54%

-36.53%

+26.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.29%

-36.53%

+19.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.45%

-38.58%

+11.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.95%

-46.51%

+3.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-23.46%

+22.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.70%

-18.73%

+10.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

9.18%

-6.36%

Volatility

FEDDX vs. DEMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Emerging Markets Discovery Fund (FEDDX) is 5.75%, while Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class A (DEMAX) has a volatility of 24.95%. This indicates that FEDDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DEMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEDDXDEMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.75%

24.95%

-19.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.28%

49.71%

-36.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.19%

53.10%

-37.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.46%

30.25%

-15.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.84%

25.88%

-10.04%

FEDDX vs. DEMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEDDX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is lower than DEMAX's 1.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEDDX vs. DEMAX - Dividend Comparison

FEDDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, less than DEMAX's 10.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEMAX
Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class A
10.15%19.03%1.74%2.76%1.60%3.16%0.56%0.57%0.34%1.59%0.70%0.03%
FEDDX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Discovery Fund
3.83%4.65%3.99%2.05%1.69%11.90%0.59%1.05%1.88%1.50%1.36%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEDDX and DEMAX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DEMAX has higher volatility (24.95%) compared to FEDDX (5.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEDDX dropped -42.95% vs DEMAX's -63.23%.

DEMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEDDX and DEMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer