FECMX vs. CNWIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FECMX (Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Fund Class I) and CNWIX (Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FECMX returned 7.35%/yr vs 8.94%/yr for CNWIX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FECMX charges 0.87%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for CNWIX.

Performance

FECMX vs. CNWIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Fund Class I (FECMX) and Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FECMX achieves a 28.19% return, which is significantly lower than CNWIX's 51.09% return.

FECMX

• 1D: 1.69%
• 1M: 9.76%
• YTD: 28.19%
• 6M: 30.64%
• 1Y: 58.46%
• 3Y*: 23.77%
• 5Y*: 7.35%
• 10Y*: —

CNWIX

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: 14.41%
• YTD: 51.09%
• 6M: 54.41%
• 1Y: 72.44%
• 3Y*: 29.77%
• 5Y*: 8.94%
• 10Y*: 12.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FECMX vs. CNWIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FECMX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Fund Class I	28.19%	31.00%	7.13%	15.15%	-27.49%	-0.57%
CNWIX Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I	51.09%	19.29%	14.99%	6.60%	-24.35%	-4.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FECMX and CNWIX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2021	0.92

The correlation between FECMX and CNWIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FECMX vs. CNWIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FECMX

FECMX Risk / Return Rank: 86
FECMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
FECMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FECMX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FECMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FECMX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

CNWIX

CNWIX Risk / Return Rank: 86
CNWIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
CNWIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
CNWIX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
CNWIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
CNWIX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FECMX vs. CNWIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Fund Class I (FECMX) and Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FECMX	CNWIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.10	3.17	-0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.91	3.79	+0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.57	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.50	4.48	+0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.07	16.56	+0.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FECMX vs. CNWIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FECMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is comparable to the CNWIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FECMX and CNWIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FECMX	CNWIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.10	3.17	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	0.49	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.36	+0.08

Drawdowns

FECMX vs. CNWIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FECMX drawdown since its inception was -40.89%, smaller than the maximum CNWIX drawdown of -43.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FECMX and CNWIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FECMX	CNWIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.89%	-43.57%	+2.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.02%	-16.28%	+3.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.14%	-19.34%	+0.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.89%	-37.36%	-3.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.57%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.90%	-16.43%	+0.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.43%	4.39%	-0.96%

Volatility

FECMX vs. CNWIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Fund Class I (FECMX) is 7.94%, while Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX) has a volatility of 10.53%. This indicates that FECMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNWIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FECMX	CNWIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.94%	10.53%	-2.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.09%	20.15%	-4.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.94%	22.99%	-4.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.93%	18.45%	+0.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.90%	24.47%	-5.57%

FECMX vs. CNWIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FECMX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than CNWIX's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

FECMX vs. CNWIX - Dividend Comparison

FECMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than CNWIX's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CNWIX Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I	0.04%	0.06%	0.00%	0.54%	0.97%	2.79%	2.01%	1.04%	0.00%	0.42%	0.00%	0.38%
FECMX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Fund Class I	0.03%	0.04%	0.64%	1.13%	0.86%	6.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FECMX and CNWIX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, FECMX and CNWIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FECMX or CNWIX?

CNWIX has higher volatility (10.53%) compared to FECMX (7.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FECMX dropped -40.89% vs CNWIX's -43.57%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CNWIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 3.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.