PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FECGX vs. DMCRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FECGX vs. DMCRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX) and Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FECGX achieves a 19.33% return, which is significantly lower than DMCRX's 31.07% return.


FECGX

1D
-1.14%
1M
1.31%
6M
11.86%
YTD
19.33%
1Y
34.06%
3Y*
17.24%
5Y*
5.43%
10Y*

DMCRX

1D
-1.50%
1M
6.38%
6M
22.94%
YTD
31.07%
1Y
79.24%
3Y*
30.91%
5Y*
11.43%
10Y*
22.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FECGX vs. DMCRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FECGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund
19.33%13.04%15.26%18.90%-26.17%2.83%34.41%7.11%
DMCRX
Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund
31.07%31.17%30.58%11.47%-33.54%22.23%86.43%3.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FECGX and DMCRX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.93

The correlation between FECGX and DMCRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FECGX vs. DMCRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FECGX
FECGX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FECGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FECGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
FECGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FECGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FECGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

DMCRX
DMCRX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DMCRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMCRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMCRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
DMCRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMCRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FECGX vs. DMCRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX) and Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FECGXDMCRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.39

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

4.98

-2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.76

17.17

-9.41

FECGX vs. DMCRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FECGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is lower than the DMCRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FECGX and DMCRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FECGX vs. DMCRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FECGX drawdown since its inception was -41.85%, smaller than the maximum DMCRX drawdown of -46.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FECGX and DMCRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FECGXDMCRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.85%

-46.68%

+4.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.81%

-15.46%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.45%

-34.92%

+6.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.34%

-46.68%

+6.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.39%

-2.19%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.54%

-14.74%

-0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.14%

4.47%

-0.33%

Volatility

FECGX vs. DMCRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX) is 6.35%, while Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX) has a volatility of 8.72%. This indicates that FECGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DMCRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FECGXDMCRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.35%

8.72%

-2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.75%

22.72%

-5.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.19%

29.82%

-7.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.70%

28.72%

-4.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.14%

28.01%

-0.87%

FECGX vs. DMCRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FECGX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than DMCRX's 1.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

FECGX vs. DMCRX - Dividend Comparison

FECGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than DMCRX's 10.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DMCRX
Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund
10.47%13.72%3.86%0.87%8.20%48.23%19.79%14.70%33.22%8.91%0.00%4.20%
FECGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund
0.45%0.54%1.25%0.81%0.80%3.43%1.00%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, FECGX and DMCRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DMCRX has higher volatility (8.72%) compared to FECGX (6.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FECGX dropped -41.85% vs DMCRX's -46.68%.

DMCRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FECGX and DMCRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer