FEBZ vs. XBAP

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FEBZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF) and XBAP (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. FEBZ is passively managed, while XBAP is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FEBZ returned 10.98%/yr vs 9.64%/yr for XBAP. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

FEBZ vs. XBAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF (FEBZ) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEBZ achieves a 7.05% return, which is significantly lower than XBAP's 7.98% return.

FEBZ

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: 7.05%
• 6M: 6.68%
• 1Y: 19.20%
• 3Y*: 14.99%
• 5Y*: 10.98%
• 10Y*: —

XBAP

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 7.98%
• 6M: 8.23%
• 1Y: 15.47%
• 3Y*: 13.36%
• 5Y*: 9.64%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEBZ vs. XBAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FEBZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF	7.05%	12.97%	16.88%	20.65%	-10.32%	15.64%
XBAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April	7.98%	13.38%	11.55%	20.53%	-7.59%	7.65%

Correlation

The correlation between FEBZ and XBAP is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2021	0.89

The correlation between FEBZ and XBAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FEBZ vs. XBAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEBZ

FEBZ Risk / Return Rank: 60
FEBZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FEBZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
FEBZ Omega Ratio Rank: 61
FEBZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
FEBZ Martin Ratio Rank: 64

XBAP

XBAP Risk / Return Rank: 98
XBAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
XBAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
XBAP Omega Ratio Rank: 98
XBAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
XBAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEBZ vs. XBAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF (FEBZ) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEBZ	XBAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	4.32	-2.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.73	7.88	-5.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	2.13	-0.77
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	11.99	-9.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.33	69.63	-58.30

FEBZ vs. XBAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEBZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is lower than the XBAP Sharpe Ratio of 4.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEBZ and XBAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FEBZ vs. XBAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEBZ drawdown since its inception was -17.50%, which is greater than XBAP's maximum drawdown of -14.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEBZ and XBAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEBZ	XBAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.50%	-14.57%	-2.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.14%	-1.30%	-5.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.68%	-8.25%	-6.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.50%	-14.57%	-2.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.35%	-0.32%	-1.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.31%	-1.73%	-1.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.70%	0.22%	+1.48%

Volatility

FEBZ vs. XBAP - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF (FEBZ) has a higher volatility of 3.37% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP) at 1.52%. This indicates that FEBZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEBZ	XBAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.37%	1.52%	+1.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.60%	2.91%	+4.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.72%	3.60%	+6.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.53%	9.98%	+2.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.37%	9.84%	+2.53%

FEBZ vs. XBAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FEBZ and XBAP have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

FEBZ vs. XBAP - Dividend Comparison

FEBZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, while XBAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FEBZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF	2.99%	3.20%	3.88%	6.81%
XBAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEBZ and XBAP in my portfolio?

FEBZ and XBAP have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FEBZ or XBAP?

FEBZ has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to XBAP (1.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEBZ dropped -17.50% vs XBAP's -14.57%.

Which ETF is better, FEBZ or XBAP?

On 5-year performance, FEBZ leads with 10.98% vs 9.64% for XBAP. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, XBAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FEBZ or XBAP?

Over the 5-year period, FEBZ has performed better with a 10.98% return vs 9.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEBZ or XBAP?

FEBZ and XBAP have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FEBZ or XBAP?

FEBZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.99%, compared with 0.00% for XBAP.

What is the main difference between FEBZ and XBAP?

They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Innovator.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XBAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.32 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.