FEBZ vs. DIVZ

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FEBZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF) and DIVZ (Opal Dividend Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FEBZ is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500 Price Index, while DIVZ is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by TrueShares. FEBZ is passively managed, while DIVZ is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FEBZ returned 10.98%/yr vs 9.27%/yr for DIVZ. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEBZ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DIVZ.

Performance

FEBZ vs. DIVZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF (FEBZ) and Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEBZ achieves a 7.05% return, which is significantly higher than DIVZ's 3.70% return.

FEBZ

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: 7.05%
• 6M: 6.68%
• 1Y: 19.20%
• 3Y*: 14.99%
• 5Y*: 10.98%
• 10Y*: —

DIVZ

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: -2.53%
• YTD: 3.70%
• 6M: 3.95%
• 1Y: 11.58%
• 3Y*: 15.08%
• 5Y*: 9.27%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEBZ vs. DIVZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FEBZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF	7.05%	12.97%	16.88%	20.65%	-10.32%	20.46%
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF	3.70%	16.72%	18.44%	-0.51%	3.51%	21.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FEBZ and DIVZ is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2021	0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between FEBZ and DIVZ has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FEBZ vs. DIVZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEBZ

FEBZ Risk / Return Rank: 60
FEBZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FEBZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
FEBZ Omega Ratio Rank: 61
FEBZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
FEBZ Martin Ratio Rank: 64

DIVZ

DIVZ Risk / Return Rank: 35
DIVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
DIVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
DIVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 32
DIVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
DIVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEBZ vs. DIVZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF (FEBZ) and Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEBZ	DIVZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	1.23	+0.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.73	1.79	+0.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.21	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	1.99	+0.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.33	4.75	+6.59

FEBZ vs. DIVZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEBZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the DIVZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEBZ and DIVZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FEBZ vs. DIVZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEBZ drawdown since its inception was -17.50%, which is greater than DIVZ's maximum drawdown of -15.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEBZ and DIVZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEBZ	DIVZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.50%	-15.42%	-2.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.14%	-5.83%	-1.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.68%	-9.52%	-5.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.50%	-15.42%	-2.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.35%	-3.95%	+2.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.31%	-3.48%	+0.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.70%	2.45%	-0.75%

Volatility

FEBZ vs. DIVZ - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF (FEBZ) and Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ) have volatilities of 3.37% and 3.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEBZ	DIVZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.37%	3.32%	+0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.60%	7.16%	+0.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.72%	9.44%	+0.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.53%	12.62%	-0.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.37%	12.56%	-0.19%

FEBZ vs. DIVZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEBZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVZ's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEBZ vs. DIVZ - Dividend Comparison

FEBZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, more than DIVZ's 2.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF	2.58%	2.60%	2.63%	3.66%	3.23%	3.83%
FEBZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF	2.99%	3.20%	3.88%	6.81%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEBZ and DIVZ in my portfolio?

FEBZ and DIVZ have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FEBZ or DIVZ?

FEBZ has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to DIVZ (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEBZ dropped -17.50% vs DIVZ's -15.42%.

Which ETF is better, FEBZ or DIVZ?

On 5-year performance, FEBZ leads with 10.98% vs 9.27% for DIVZ. On fees, DIVZ is cheaper at 0.65% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FEBZ or DIVZ?

Over the 5-year period, FEBZ has performed better with a 10.98% return vs 9.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEBZ or DIVZ?

DIVZ is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for FEBZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FEBZ or DIVZ?

FEBZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.99%, compared with 2.58% for DIVZ.

What is the main difference between FEBZ and DIVZ?

FEBZ is categorized as Defined Outcome, while DIVZ is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for FEBZ and 0.65% for DIVZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FEBZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.