FEBW vs. LITL

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FEBW (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Feb ETF) and LITL (Simplify Piper Sandler US Small-Cap PLUS Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FEBW is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz, while LITL is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FEBW returned 11.40% vs 31.53% for LITL. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FEBW charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for LITL.

Performance

FEBW vs. LITL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Feb ETF (FEBW) and Simplify Piper Sandler US Small-Cap PLUS Income ETF (LITL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEBW achieves a 5.26% return, which is significantly lower than LITL's 15.04% return.

FEBW

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 0.62%
• 6M: 4.33%
• YTD: 5.26%
• 1Y: 11.40%
• 3Y*: 10.21%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.78%

LITL

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: -2.40%
• 6M: 12.72%
• YTD: 15.04%
• 1Y: 31.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 28.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FEBW Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Feb ETF	$262.33K	$241.63K	$322.67K
LITL Simplify Piper Sandler US Small-Cap PLUS Income ETF	$92.88K	$67.65K	$57.85K

FEBW vs. LITL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FEBW Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Feb ETF	5.26%	12.38%
LITL Simplify Piper Sandler US Small-Cap PLUS Income ETF	15.04%	18.93%

Correlation

The correlation between FEBW and LITL is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025	0.73

The correlation between FEBW and LITL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FEBW vs. LITL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FEBW

FEBW Risk / Return Rank: 86
FEBW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FEBW Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
FEBW Omega Ratio Rank: 91
FEBW Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
FEBW Martin Ratio Rank: 88

LITL

LITL Risk / Return Rank: 72
LITL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
LITL Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
LITL Omega Ratio Rank: 63
LITL Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
LITL Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FEBW vs. LITL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Feb ETF (FEBW) and Simplify Piper Sandler US Small-Cap PLUS Income ETF (LITL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEBW	LITL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	1.57	+0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.11	2.35	+0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.27	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.67	3.05	-0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.59	9.55	+4.04

FEBW vs. LITL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEBW Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the LITL Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEBW and LITL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FEBW vs. LITL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEBW drawdown since its inception was -8.82%, smaller than the maximum LITL drawdown of -9.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEBW and LITL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEBW	LITL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.82%	-9.32%	+0.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.00%	-9.32%	+5.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.07%	-2.98%	+2.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.66%	-2.24%	+1.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.78%	2.98%	-2.20%

Volatility

FEBW vs. LITL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Feb ETF (FEBW) is 1.41%, while Simplify Piper Sandler US Small-Cap PLUS Income ETF (LITL) has a volatility of 3.56%. This indicates that FEBW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LITL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEBW	LITL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.41%	3.56%	-2.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.18%	12.19%	-8.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.95%	18.20%	-13.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.25%	18.33%	-12.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.25%	18.33%	-12.08%

FEBW vs. LITL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEBW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than LITL's 0.91% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEBW vs. LITL - Dividend Comparison

FEBW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LITL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FEBW Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Feb ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.14%
LITL Simplify Piper Sandler US Small-Cap PLUS Income ETF	1.67%	0.71%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEBW and LITL in my portfolio?

FEBW and LITL have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FEBW or LITL?

LITL has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to FEBW (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEBW dropped -8.82% vs LITL's -9.32%.

Which ETF is better, FEBW or LITL?

On 1-year performance, LITL leads with 31.53% vs 11.40% for FEBW. On fees, FEBW is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, FEBW has been the lower-risk option at 1.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FEBW or LITL?

Over the 1-year period, LITL has performed better with a 31.53% return vs 11.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEBW or LITL?

FEBW is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.91% for LITL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FEBW or LITL?

LITL has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.00% for FEBW.

What is the main difference between FEBW and LITL?

FEBW is categorized as Options Trading, while LITL is Small Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FEBW and 0.91% for LITL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FEBW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.