PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEAT vs. YBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FEAT vs. YBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) and YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF (YBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FEAT vs. YBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FEAT
YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF
-16.45%-4.21%-9.09%
YBIT
YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF
-19.99%-2.49%-10.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEAT achieves a -16.45% return, which is significantly higher than YBIT's -19.99% return.


FEAT

1D
4.90%
1M
-2.24%
YTD
-16.45%
6M
-27.06%
1Y
-9.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

YBIT

1D
1.84%
1M
4.70%
YTD
-19.99%
6M
-36.23%
1Y
-15.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FEAT vs. YBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEAT has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than YBIT's 0.99% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FEAT vs. YBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEAT
FEAT Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FEAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEAT Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FEAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEAT Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

YBIT
YBIT Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
YBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
YBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
YBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
YBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEAT vs. YBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) and YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF (YBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEATYBITDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.32

-0.41

+0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.25

-0.35

+0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

0.96

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.29

-0.34

+0.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.70

-0.79

+0.09

FEAT vs. YBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is comparable to the YBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEAT and YBIT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEATYBITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.32

-0.41

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.71

-0.31

-0.41

Correlation

The correlation between FEAT and YBIT is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FEAT vs. YBIT - Dividend Comparison

FEAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 93.83%, less than YBIT's 103.57% yield.


Drawdowns

FEAT vs. YBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEAT drawdown since its inception was -31.68%, smaller than the maximum YBIT drawdown of -45.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAT and YBIT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FEATYBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.68%

-45.54%

+13.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.68%

-45.54%

+13.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.34%

-39.63%

+11.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.15%

-13.29%

+1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.03%

19.82%

-6.79%

Volatility

FEAT vs. YBIT - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) has a higher volatility of 10.59% compared to YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF (YBIT) at 9.50%. This indicates that FEAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FEATYBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.59%

9.50%

+1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.69%

31.42%

-7.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.35%

37.31%

-7.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.11%

39.63%

-8.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.11%

39.63%

-8.52%