FEAT vs. UMAX.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) and Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (UMAX.TO).
FEAT and UMAX.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FEAT is a passively managed fund by YieldMax that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Dorsey Wright Tactical Option Income Strategy Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2024. UMAX.TO is an actively managed fund by Hamilton Capital. It was launched on Jun 14, 2023.
Performance
FEAT vs. UMAX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FEAT vs. UMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FEAT YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF | -16.45% | -4.21% | -9.09% |
UMAX.TO Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | 3.53% | 15.22% | -0.96% |
Different Trading Currencies
FEAT is traded in USD, while UMAX.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the UMAX.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEAT achieves a -16.45% return, which is significantly lower than UMAX.TO's 3.53% return.
FEAT
- 1D
- 4.90%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- YTD
- -16.45%
- 6M
- -27.06%
- 1Y
- -9.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UMAX.TO
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- -4.03%
- YTD
- 3.53%
- 6M
- 5.60%
- 1Y
- 15.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FEAT vs. UMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEAT has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than UMAX.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FEAT vs. UMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FEAT
UMAX.TO
FEAT vs. UMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) and Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (UMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEAT | UMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | 1.54 | -1.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | 2.24 | -2.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.30 | -0.33 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.29 | 2.13 | -2.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.70 | 11.23 | -11.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEAT | UMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.32 | 1.54 | -1.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.71 | 0.53 | -1.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between FEAT and UMAX.TO is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FEAT vs. UMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison
FEAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 93.83%, more than UMAX.TO's 13.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FEAT YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF | 93.83% | 76.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UMAX.TO Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | 13.09% | 14.86% | 14.81% | 6.96% |
Drawdowns
FEAT vs. UMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEAT drawdown since its inception was -31.68%, which is greater than UMAX.TO's maximum drawdown of -13.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAT and UMAX.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEAT | UMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.68% | -10.09% | -21.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.68% | -6.23% | -25.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.34% | -2.84% | -25.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.15% | -2.05% | -10.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.03% | 1.39% | +11.64% |
Volatility
FEAT vs. UMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) has a higher volatility of 10.59% compared to Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (UMAX.TO) at 2.03%. This indicates that FEAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FEAT | UMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.59% | 2.03% | +8.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.69% | 5.72% | +17.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.35% | 9.84% | +19.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.11% | 11.04% | +20.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.11% | 11.04% | +20.07% |