FEAT vs. UIQ4.DE

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) and UBS Euro Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF EUR Acc (UIQ4.DE).

FEAT and UIQ4.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FEAT is a passively managed fund by YieldMax that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Dorsey Wright Tactical Option Income Strategy Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2024. UIQ4.DE is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Euro Equity Defensive Put Write Index. It was launched on Jun 27, 2016. Both FEAT and UIQ4.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

FEAT vs. UIQ4.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) and UBS Euro Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF EUR Acc (UIQ4.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FEAT vs. UIQ4.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FEAT YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF	-16.45%	-3.09%
UIQ4.DE UBS Euro Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF EUR Acc	-2.53%	9.43%

Different Trading Currencies

FEAT is traded in USD, while UIQ4.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the UIQ4.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEAT achieves a -16.45% return, which is significantly lower than UIQ4.DE's -2.53% return.

FEAT

• 1D: 4.90%
• 1M: -2.24%
• YTD: -16.45%
• 6M: -27.06%
• 1Y: -9.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UIQ4.DE

• 1D: 1.44%
• 1M: -4.29%
• YTD: -2.53%
• 6M: 0.52%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEAT vs. UIQ4.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEAT has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than UIQ4.DE's 0.21% expense ratio.

FEAT

YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF

UIQ4.DE

UBS Euro Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF EUR Acc

Return for Risk

FEAT vs. UIQ4.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEAT

FEAT Risk / Return Rank: 6
FEAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
FEAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
FEAT Omega Ratio Rank: 6
FEAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
FEAT Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEAT vs. UIQ4.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) and UBS Euro Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF EUR Acc (UIQ4.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FEAT	UIQ4.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.32	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.25	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.29	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.70	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FEAT	UIQ4.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.32	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.71	0.84	-1.56

Correlation

The correlation between FEAT and UIQ4.DE is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FEAT vs. UIQ4.DE - Dividend Comparison

FEAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 93.83%, while UIQ4.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025
FEAT YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF	93.83%	76.35%
UIQ4.DE UBS Euro Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF EUR Acc	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

FEAT vs. UIQ4.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEAT drawdown since its inception was -31.68%, which is greater than UIQ4.DE's maximum drawdown of -6.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAT and UIQ4.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEAT	UIQ4.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.68%	-3.90%	-27.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.34%	-2.68%	-25.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.15%	-0.88%	-11.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.03%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FEAT	UIQ4.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.59%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.69%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.35%	9.82%	+19.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.11%	9.82%	+21.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.11%	9.82%	+21.29%