FEAT vs. SPIN
FEAT (YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF) and SPIN (State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. FEAT is passively managed, while SPIN is actively managed. Over the past year, FEAT returned -8.68% vs 19.71% for SPIN. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEAT charges 1.28%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SPIN.
Performance
FEAT vs. SPIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEAT achieves a -6.90% return, which is significantly lower than SPIN's 2.91% return.
FEAT
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- YTD
- -6.90%
- 6M
- -9.68%
- 1Y
- -8.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPIN
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 2.52%
- YTD
- 2.91%
- 6M
- 3.47%
- 1Y
- 19.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FEAT vs. SPIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FEAT YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF | -6.90% | -4.21% | -9.09% |
SPIN State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF | 2.91% | 14.14% | -2.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEAT and SPIN is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2024 | 0.67 |
The correlation between FEAT and SPIN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEAT vs. SPIN — Risk / Return Rank
FEAT
SPIN
FEAT vs. SPIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) and State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEAT | SPIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.36 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.28 | 2.02 | -2.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.56 | 8.42 | -8.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEAT | SPIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 | 1.89 | -2.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.45 | 0.95 | -1.39 |
Drawdowns
FEAT vs. SPIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEAT drawdown since its inception was -31.68%, which is greater than SPIN's maximum drawdown of -16.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAT and SPIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEAT | SPIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.68% | -16.85% | -14.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.68% | -9.81% | -21.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.14% | -0.40% | -19.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.20% | -2.29% | -10.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.65% | 2.35% | +13.30% |
Volatility
FEAT vs. SPIN - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) has a higher volatility of 6.90% compared to State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN) at 1.82%. This indicates that FEAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEAT | SPIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.90% | 1.82% | +5.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.55% | 8.03% | +11.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.94% | 10.49% | +17.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.33% | 14.33% | +16.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.33% | 14.33% | +16.00% |
FEAT vs. SPIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEAT has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than SPIN's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEAT vs. SPIN - Dividend Comparison
FEAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 89.83%, more than SPIN's 5.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FEAT YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF | 89.83% | 76.35% | 0.00% |
SPIN State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF | 5.64% | 8.20% | 2.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEAT and SPIN have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEAT has higher volatility (6.90%) compared to SPIN (1.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEAT dropped -31.68% vs SPIN's -16.85%.
On 1-year performance, SPIN leads with 19.71% vs -8.68% for FEAT. On fees, SPIN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SPIN has been the lower-risk option at 1.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPIN has performed better with a 19.71% return vs -8.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPIN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for FEAT.
FEAT has the higher dividend yield at 89.83%, compared with 5.64% for SPIN.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.28% for FEAT and 0.25% for SPIN.
SPIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEAT and SPIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer