FEAT vs. HBIL-U.TO
FEAT (YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF) and HBIL-U.TO (Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF USD Unhedged Units) are both exchange-traded funds - FEAT is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Nasdaq Dorsey Wright Tactical Option Income Strategy Index, while HBIL-U.TO is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Hamilton. FEAT is passively managed, while HBIL-U.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, FEAT returned -15.48% vs 4.03% for HBIL-U.TO. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FEAT vs. HBIL-U.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEAT achieves a -6.78% return, which is significantly lower than HBIL-U.TO's 1.33% return.
FEAT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- -7.14%
- YTD
- -6.78%
- 1Y
- -15.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HBIL-U.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 1.33%
- 1Y
- 4.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FEAT vs. HBIL-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FEAT YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF | -6.78% | -4.21% | -9.44% |
HBIL-U.TO Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF USD Unhedged Units | 1.33% | 4.81% | -0.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEAT and HBIL-U.TO is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2024 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEAT vs. HBIL-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FEAT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HBIL-U.TO
FEAT vs. HBIL-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) and Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF USD Unhedged Units (HBIL-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FEAT | HBIL-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.48 | -0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | 3.79 | -4.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.84 | 14.49 | -15.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FEAT vs. HBIL-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEAT drawdown since its inception was -31.68%, which is greater than HBIL-U.TO's maximum drawdown of -1.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAT and HBIL-U.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEAT | HBIL-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.68% | -1.48% | -30.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.68% | -1.07% | -30.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.04% | -1.00% | -19.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.69% | -0.33% | -13.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.61% | 0.28% | +16.33% |
Volatility
FEAT vs. HBIL-U.TO - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) has a higher volatility of 7.94% compared to Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF USD Unhedged Units (HBIL-U.TO) at 1.21%. This indicates that FEAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HBIL-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEAT | HBIL-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.94% | 1.21% | +6.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.22% | 1.64% | +18.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.72% | 1.91% | +26.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.17% | 2.12% | +28.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.17% | 2.12% | +28.05% |
Dividends
FEAT vs. HBIL-U.TO - Dividend Comparison
FEAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HBIL-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.75%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FEAT YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF | 77.86% | 76.35% | 0.00% |
HBIL-U.TO Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF USD Unhedged Units | 6.75% | 7.37% | 2.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEAT and HBIL-U.TO have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEAT is categorized as Derivative Income, while HBIL-U.TO is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Hamilton.
Find the right allocation for FEAT and HBIL-U.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer