FEAT vs. CBNK.TO
FEAT (YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF) and CBNK.TO (Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. FEAT is passively managed, while CBNK.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, FEAT returned -8.68% vs 76.91% for CBNK.TO. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FEAT vs. CBNK.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FEAT is traded in USD, while CBNK.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CBNK.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEAT achieves a -6.90% return, which is significantly lower than CBNK.TO's 24.00% return.
FEAT
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- YTD
- -6.90%
- 6M
- -9.68%
- 1Y
- -8.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBNK.TO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 5.59%
- YTD
- 24.00%
- 6M
- 32.69%
- 1Y
- 76.91%
- 3Y*
- 37.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FEAT vs. CBNK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FEAT YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF | -6.90% | -4.21% | -9.09% |
CBNK.TO Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF | 24.00% | 58.94% | -1.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEAT and CBNK.TO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2024 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEAT vs. CBNK.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FEAT
CBNK.TO
FEAT vs. CBNK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) and Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF (CBNK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEAT | CBNK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.77 | -0.80 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.28 | 7.06 | -7.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.56 | 30.68 | -31.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEAT | CBNK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 | 4.65 | -4.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.45 | 0.81 | -1.26 |
Drawdowns
FEAT vs. CBNK.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEAT drawdown since its inception was -31.68%, smaller than the maximum CBNK.TO drawdown of -38.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAT and CBNK.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEAT | CBNK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.68% | -38.51% | +6.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.68% | -10.94% | -20.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.14% | -2.92% | -17.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.20% | -14.36% | +1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.65% | 2.51% | +13.14% |
Volatility
FEAT vs. CBNK.TO - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) has a higher volatility of 6.90% compared to Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF (CBNK.TO) at 5.64%. This indicates that FEAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBNK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEAT | CBNK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.90% | 5.64% | +1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.55% | 14.21% | +5.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.94% | 16.62% | +11.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.33% | 20.39% | +9.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.33% | 20.39% | +9.94% |
Dividends
FEAT vs. CBNK.TO - Dividend Comparison
FEAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 89.83%, more than CBNK.TO's 5.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBNK.TO Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF | 5.94% | 5.86% | 8.25% | 9.59% | 7.85% |
FEAT YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF | 89.83% | 76.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEAT and CBNK.TO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Mulvihill.
Find the right allocation for FEAT and CBNK.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer