FEAT vs. BKCC.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) and Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF (BKCC.TO).
FEAT and BKCC.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FEAT is a passively managed fund by YieldMax that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Dorsey Wright Tactical Option Income Strategy Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2024. BKCC.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on May 16, 2011.
Performance
FEAT vs. BKCC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FEAT vs. BKCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FEAT YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF | -16.45% | -4.21% | -9.09% |
BKCC.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF | -0.43% | 34.19% | -1.10% |
Different Trading Currencies
FEAT is traded in USD, while BKCC.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the BKCC.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEAT achieves a -16.45% return, which is significantly lower than BKCC.TO's -0.43% return.
FEAT
- 1D
- 4.90%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- YTD
- -16.45%
- 6M
- -27.06%
- 1Y
- -9.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKCC.TO
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- -5.57%
- YTD
- -0.43%
- 6M
- 10.75%
- 1Y
- 38.21%
- 3Y*
- 15.70%
- 5Y*
- 7.34%
- 10Y*
- 7.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FEAT vs. BKCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEAT has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than BKCC.TO's 0.84% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FEAT vs. BKCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FEAT
BKCC.TO
FEAT vs. BKCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) and Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF (BKCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEAT | BKCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | 2.89 | -3.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | 3.93 | -4.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.58 | -0.61 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.29 | 4.41 | -4.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.70 | 20.16 | -20.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEAT | BKCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.32 | 2.89 | -3.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.71 | -0.00 | -0.71 |
Correlation
The correlation between FEAT and BKCC.TO is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FEAT vs. BKCC.TO - Dividend Comparison
FEAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 93.83%, more than BKCC.TO's 9.64% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEAT YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF | 93.83% | 76.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BKCC.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF | 9.64% | 10.43% | 12.30% | 10.93% | 8.23% | 5.52% | 5.92% | 5.44% | 6.24% | 5.76% | 5.79% | 7.35% |
Drawdowns
FEAT vs. BKCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEAT drawdown since its inception was -31.68%, smaller than the maximum BKCC.TO drawdown of -100.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAT and BKCC.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEAT | BKCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.68% | -100.33% | +68.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.68% | -7.71% | -23.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.34% | -100.00% | +71.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.15% | -99.92% | +87.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.03% | 1.85% | +11.18% |
Volatility
FEAT vs. BKCC.TO - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT) has a higher volatility of 10.59% compared to Global X Equal Weight Canadian Bank Covered Call ETF (BKCC.TO) at 5.73%. This indicates that FEAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FEAT | BKCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.59% | 5.73% | +4.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.69% | 9.32% | +14.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.35% | 13.30% | +16.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.11% | 16.51% | +14.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.11% | 19.93% | +11.18% |