PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDYNX vs. SHAPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDYNX vs. SHAPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin DynaTech Fund Class C (FDYNX) and ClearBridge Appreciation Fund (SHAPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDYNX achieves a 13.14% return, which is significantly higher than SHAPX's 6.04% return. Over the past 10 years, FDYNX has outperformed SHAPX with an annualized return of 17.50%, while SHAPX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.25% annualized return.


FDYNX

1D
0.42%
1M
7.20%
YTD
13.14%
6M
12.11%
1Y
29.80%
3Y*
24.92%
5Y*
10.53%
10Y*
17.50%

SHAPX

1D
-0.05%
1M
2.33%
YTD
6.04%
6M
5.66%
1Y
17.56%
3Y*
17.64%
5Y*
11.44%
10Y*
13.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDYNX vs. SHAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDYNX
Franklin DynaTech Fund Class C
13.14%17.74%29.60%43.35%-40.76%11.67%56.51%35.33%2.09%38.25%
SHAPX
ClearBridge Appreciation Fund
6.04%14.32%22.37%19.50%-12.56%23.52%14.53%29.84%-2.19%18.31%

Correlation

The correlation between FDYNX and SHAPX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 1996

0.82

The correlation between FDYNX and SHAPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDYNX vs. SHAPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDYNX
FDYNX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
FDYNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDYNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDYNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FDYNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDYNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

SHAPX
SHAPX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
SHAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SHAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDYNX vs. SHAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin DynaTech Fund Class C (FDYNX) and ClearBridge Appreciation Fund (SHAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDYNXSHAPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.32

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

2.07

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.57

9.48

-4.91

FDYNX vs. SHAPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDYNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the SHAPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDYNX and SHAPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDYNXSHAPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

1.73

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.77

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.79

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.79

-0.28

Drawdowns

FDYNX vs. SHAPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDYNX drawdown since its inception was -52.51%, which is greater than SHAPX's maximum drawdown of -46.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDYNX and SHAPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDYNXSHAPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.51%

-46.19%

-6.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.72%

-8.74%

-11.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.35%

-16.15%

-10.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.64%

-20.53%

-28.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.64%

-32.21%

-16.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.49%

+0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.30%

-4.78%

-9.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.68%

1.91%

+4.77%

Volatility

FDYNX vs. SHAPX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin DynaTech Fund Class C (FDYNX) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to ClearBridge Appreciation Fund (SHAPX) at 2.46%. This indicates that FDYNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHAPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDYNXSHAPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

2.46%

+2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.85%

7.90%

+7.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.39%

10.46%

+9.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.22%

14.86%

+11.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.62%

16.73%

+7.89%

FDYNX vs. SHAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDYNX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than SHAPX's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDYNX vs. SHAPX - Dividend Comparison

FDYNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.94%, less than SHAPX's 13.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDYNX
Franklin DynaTech Fund Class C
12.94%14.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.76%0.00%0.90%3.51%2.10%4.16%2.85%
SHAPX
ClearBridge Appreciation Fund
13.27%14.08%9.00%4.17%8.85%6.54%4.13%7.09%6.71%5.10%3.29%4.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDYNX and SHAPX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDYNX has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to SHAPX (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDYNX dropped -52.51% vs SHAPX's -46.19%.

SHAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDYNX and SHAPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer