FDVV vs. GPIX

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) and GPIX (Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDVV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Core Dividend Index, while GPIX is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. FDVV is passively managed, while GPIX is actively managed. Over the past year, FDVV returned 23.92% vs 23.85% for GPIX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.29% expense ratio.

Performance

FDVV vs. GPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDVV achieves a 9.30% return, which is significantly higher than GPIX's 8.64% return.

FDVV

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 3.73%
• YTD: 9.30%
• 6M: 9.44%
• 1Y: 23.92%
• 3Y*: 19.75%
• 5Y*: 13.53%
• 10Y*: —

GPIX

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 0.57%
• YTD: 8.64%
• 6M: 9.22%
• 1Y: 23.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDVV vs. GPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	9.30%	17.08%	21.81%	13.19%
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF	8.64%	16.25%	21.77%	13.04%

Correlation

The correlation between FDVV and GPIX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023	0.83

The correlation between FDVV and GPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDVV vs. GPIX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDVV	GPIX
Technology	30.5%	39.2%
Financial Services	17.0%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	13.6%	10.1%
Consumer Defensive	10.7%	4.4%
Real Estate	9.9%	1.8%
Utilities	8.6%	2.2%
Communication Services	3.6%	10.7%
Healthcare	3.0%	8.3%
Industrials	3.0%	7.7%
Basic Materials	-	1.7%
Energy	-	3.2%

Return for Risk

FDVV vs. GPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDVV

FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 73
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 64

GPIX

GPIX Risk / Return Rank: 77
GPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
GPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
GPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
GPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
GPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDVV vs. GPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDVV	GPIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	2.15	+0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.14	2.94	+0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.41	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.44	2.97	-0.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.11	14.51	-4.40

FDVV vs. GPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDVV Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the GPIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDVV and GPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDVV vs. GPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDVV drawdown since its inception was -40.25%, which is greater than GPIX's maximum drawdown of -17.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDVV and GPIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDVV	GPIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.25%	-17.50%	-22.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.30%	-7.71%	-1.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.18%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.29%	-1.63%	+1.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.80%	-1.49%	-2.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.24%	1.57%	+0.67%

Volatility

FDVV vs. GPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) is 3.16%, while Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) has a volatility of 3.77%. This indicates that FDVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDVV	GPIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.16%	3.77%	-0.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.16%	8.51%	-0.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.12%	10.62%	-0.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.76%	13.86%	+0.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.98%	13.86%	+3.12%

FDVV vs. GPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FDVV and GPIX have an expense ratio of 0.29%.

Dividends

FDVV vs. GPIX - Dividend Comparison

FDVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, less than GPIX's 8.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	2.70%	2.89%	2.94%	3.77%	3.44%	2.70%	3.19%	3.93%	4.05%	3.66%	1.04%
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF	8.09%	8.01%	7.45%	1.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDVV and GPIX in my portfolio?

FDVV and GPIX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDVV or GPIX?

GPIX has higher volatility (3.77%) compared to FDVV (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDVV dropped -40.25% vs GPIX's -17.50%.

Which ETF is better, FDVV or GPIX?

On 1-year performance, FDVV leads with 23.92% vs 23.85% for GPIX. Both ETFs have the same 0.29% expense ratio. On volatility, FDVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDVV or GPIX?

Over the 1-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 23.92% return vs 23.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDVV or GPIX?

FDVV and GPIX have the same expense ratio: 0.29% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDVV or GPIX?

GPIX has the higher dividend yield at 8.09%, compared with 2.70% for FDVV.

What is the main difference between FDVV and GPIX?

FDVV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while GPIX is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Goldman Sachs.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.