FDVV vs. AIRR
FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) and AIRR (First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDVV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Core Dividend Index, while AIRR is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDVV returned 13.53%/yr vs 25.46%/yr for AIRR. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDVV charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AIRR.
Performance
FDVV vs. AIRR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDVV achieves a 9.30% return, which is significantly lower than AIRR's 31.74% return.
FDVV
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 2.54%
- YTD
- 9.30%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- 23.92%
- 3Y*
- 19.75%
- 5Y*
- 13.53%
- 10Y*
- —
AIRR
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- YTD
- 31.74%
- 6M
- 28.77%
- 1Y
- 67.12%
- 3Y*
- 35.29%
- 5Y*
- 25.46%
- 10Y*
- 22.05%
FDVV vs. AIRR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 9.30% | 17.08% | 21.81% | 18.00% | -4.21% | 29.24% | 2.80% | 24.07% | -1.26% | 14.00% |
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 31.74% | 27.92% | 33.45% | 31.43% | -2.08% | 33.01% | 17.17% | 33.97% | -20.57% | 16.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDVV and AIRR is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016 | 0.75 |
The correlation between FDVV and AIRR shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FDVV vs. AIRR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDVV
AIRR
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
Technology
FDVV
AIRR
Financial Services
FDVV
AIRR
Consumer Cyclical
FDVV
AIRR
-
Consumer Defensive
FDVV
AIRR
-
Real Estate
FDVV
AIRR
-
Utilities
FDVV
AIRR
-
Communication Services
FDVV
AIRR
-
Healthcare
FDVV
AIRR
-
Industrials
FDVV
AIRR
Basic Materials
FDVV
-
AIRR
-
Energy
FDVV
-
AIRR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDVV vs. AIRR — Risk / Return Rank
FDVV
AIRR
FDVV vs. AIRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDVV | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.40 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 5.01 | -2.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.11 | 18.33 | -8.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDVV vs. AIRR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDVV drawdown since its inception was -40.25%, smaller than the maximum AIRR drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDVV and AIRR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDVV | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.25% | -42.37% | +2.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.30% | -13.09% | +3.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.90% | -27.95% | +12.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.18% | -27.95% | +7.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -1.89% | +1.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.80% | -7.48% | +3.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 3.57% | -1.33% |
Volatility
FDVV vs. AIRR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) is 3.16%, while First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) has a volatility of 9.32%. This indicates that FDVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDVV | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.16% | 9.32% | -6.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.16% | 20.81% | -12.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.12% | 26.19% | -16.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.76% | 25.45% | -10.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 26.36% | -9.38% |
FDVV vs. AIRR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDVV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than AIRR's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDVV vs. AIRR - Dividend Comparison
FDVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, more than AIRR's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 0.13% | 0.19% | 0.18% | 0.23% | 0.12% | 0.05% | 0.10% | 0.20% | 0.43% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.47% |
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 2.70% | 2.89% | 2.94% | 3.77% | 3.44% | 2.70% | 3.19% | 3.93% | 4.05% | 3.66% | 1.04% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDVV and AIRR have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIRR has higher volatility (9.32%) compared to FDVV (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDVV dropped -40.25% vs AIRR's -42.37%.
On 5-year performance, AIRR leads with 25.46% vs 13.53% for FDVV. On fees, FDVV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AIRR has performed better with a 25.46% return vs 13.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDVV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIRR.
FDVV has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 0.13% for AIRR.
FDVV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while AIRR is Building & Construction. FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index, while AIRR tracks Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDVV and 0.69% for AIRR.
AIRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDVV and AIRR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer