PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDVLX vs. BND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDVLX vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Value Fund (FDVLX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDVLX achieves a 25.25% return, which is significantly higher than BND's -0.28% return. Over the past 10 years, FDVLX has outperformed BND with an annualized return of 14.40%, while BND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.38% annualized return.


FDVLX

1D
-0.86%
1M
2.74%
6M
17.18%
YTD
25.25%
1Y
36.12%
3Y*
24.41%
5Y*
16.19%
10Y*
14.40%
ALL TIME*
11.47%

BND

1D
0.06%
1M
-1.02%
6M
-0.53%
YTD
-0.28%
1Y
2.92%
3Y*
3.79%
5Y*
-0.37%
10Y*
1.38%
ALL TIME*
3.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$447.57M$557.69M$594.86M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FDVLX vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDVLX
Fidelity Value Fund
25.25%11.32%30.11%19.57%-9.07%35.30%9.33%31.68%-17.58%14.11%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
-0.28%7.08%1.38%5.65%-13.11%-1.86%7.71%8.84%-0.12%3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between FDVLX and BND is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2007

-0.14

The correlation between FDVLX and BND shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (all time) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDVLX vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDVLX
FDVLX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FDVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FDVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDVLX vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Value Fund (FDVLX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDVLXBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.14

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

1.10

+2.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.35

2.77

+10.58

FDVLX vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDVLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the BND Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDVLX and BND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDVLX vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDVLX drawdown since its inception was -66.91%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDVLX and BND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDVLXBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.91%

-18.58%

-48.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.90%

-2.68%

-7.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.45%

-4.81%

-26.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.45%

-17.91%

-13.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.66%

-18.58%

-30.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-2.90%

+2.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.00%

-3.06%

-5.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

1.06%

+1.56%

Volatility

FDVLX vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Value Fund (FDVLX) has a higher volatility of 3.27% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 0.96%. This indicates that FDVLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDVLXBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

0.96%

+2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.66%

2.88%

+8.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.22%

3.70%

+12.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.49%

6.03%

+20.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.14%

5.53%

+19.61%

FDVLX vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDVLX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDVLX vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

FDVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.02%, more than BND's 4.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
4.01%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
FDVLX
Fidelity Value Fund
8.02%10.05%33.05%3.71%7.08%9.79%0.98%3.34%16.25%3.38%1.26%10.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDVLX and BND have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDVLX has higher volatility (3.27%) compared to BND (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDVLX dropped -66.91% vs BND's -18.58%.

FDVLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDVLX and BND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer