PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDTCX vs. VRGWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDTCX vs. VRGWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock Fund Class C (FDTCX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRGWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDTCX achieves a 12.65% return, which is significantly higher than VRGWX's 4.54% return. Over the past 10 years, FDTCX has underperformed VRGWX with an annualized return of 16.78%, while VRGWX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.55% annualized return.


FDTCX

1D
0.88%
1M
0.22%
6M
9.63%
YTD
12.65%
1Y
22.53%
3Y*
27.59%
5Y*
15.51%
10Y*
16.78%

VRGWX

1D
1.27%
1M
1.50%
6M
3.88%
YTD
4.54%
1Y
15.94%
3Y*
22.59%
5Y*
13.77%
10Y*
18.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDTCX vs. VRGWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDTCX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock Fund Class C
12.65%12.73%49.84%26.75%-20.84%26.66%25.83%26.59%-6.74%17.64%
VRGWX
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
4.54%18.32%33.25%42.65%-29.18%32.42%38.38%36.30%-1.59%30.11%

Correlation

The correlation between FDTCX and VRGWX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.93

The correlation between FDTCX and VRGWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDTCX vs. VRGWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDTCX
FDTCX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FDTCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDTCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDTCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FDTCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDTCX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

VRGWX
VRGWX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
VRGWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRGWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRGWX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
VRGWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRGWX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDTCX vs. VRGWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock Fund Class C (FDTCX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRGWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDTCXVRGWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.17

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

0.97

+1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.28

3.08

+6.20

FDTCX vs. VRGWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDTCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the VRGWX Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDTCX and VRGWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDTCX vs. VRGWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDTCX drawdown since its inception was -63.44%, which is greater than VRGWX's maximum drawdown of -32.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTCX and VRGWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDTCXVRGWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.44%

-32.70%

-30.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.10%

-16.19%

+6.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.24%

-23.44%

-4.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.24%

-32.70%

+4.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.45%

-32.70%

+2.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.55%

-4.09%

+2.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.05%

-4.88%

-4.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.40%

5.08%

-2.68%

Volatility

FDTCX vs. VRGWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock Fund Class C (FDTCX) is 6.09%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRGWX) has a volatility of 6.55%. This indicates that FDTCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRGWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDTCXVRGWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.09%

6.55%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.75%

13.29%

-0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.64%

16.63%

-0.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.99%

21.83%

+3.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.28%

21.21%

+1.07%

FDTCX vs. VRGWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDTCX has a 1.70% expense ratio, which is higher than VRGWX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDTCX vs. VRGWX - Dividend Comparison

FDTCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.25%, more than VRGWX's 0.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDTCX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock Fund Class C
6.25%7.04%30.85%3.35%9.12%17.12%5.16%2.41%12.90%8.05%0.59%7.48%
VRGWX
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.47%0.35%0.56%0.71%0.99%4.18%0.77%1.03%1.22%1.22%1.52%1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDTCX and VRGWX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VRGWX has higher volatility (6.55%) compared to FDTCX (6.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDTCX dropped -63.44% vs VRGWX's -32.70%.

FDTCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDTCX and VRGWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer