FDNU.L vs. XLKQ.L
FDNU.L (First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD) and XLKQ.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc) are both Technology Equities funds - FDNU.L tracks the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD while XLKQ.L tracks the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDNU.L returned 4.29%/yr vs 25.27%/yr for XLKQ.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDNU.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLKQ.L.
Performance
FDNU.L vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FDNU.L is traded in USD, while XLKQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLKQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDNU.L achieves a 4.34% return, which is significantly lower than XLKQ.L's 23.50% return.
FDNU.L
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 5.40%
- YTD
- 4.34%
- 6M
- 4.66%
- 1Y
- 10.19%
- 3Y*
- 20.73%
- 5Y*
- 4.29%
- 10Y*
- —
XLKQ.L
- 1D
- -2.18%
- 1M
- 13.44%
- YTD
- 23.50%
- 6M
- 23.21%
- 1Y
- 53.05%
- 3Y*
- 36.62%
- 5Y*
- 25.27%
- 10Y*
- 26.30%
FDNU.L vs. XLKQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDNU.L First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD | 4.34% | 9.74% | 30.52% | 54.50% | -46.64% | 7.05% | 53.99% | 17.77% | -18.49% |
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc | 23.50% | 24.49% | 41.63% | 59.85% | -29.07% | 35.05% | 42.15% | 50.99% | -13.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDNU.L and XLKQ.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2018 | 0.76 |
The correlation between FDNU.L and XLKQ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FDNU.L vs. XLKQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDNU.L
XLKQ.L
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
FDNU.L
XLKQ.L
Communication Services
FDNU.L
XLKQ.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
FDNU.L
XLKQ.L
-
Financial Services
FDNU.L
XLKQ.L
Industrials
FDNU.L
XLKQ.L
Healthcare
FDNU.L
XLKQ.L
-
Basic Materials
FDNU.L
-
XLKQ.L
-
Consumer Defensive
FDNU.L
-
XLKQ.L
-
Energy
FDNU.L
-
XLKQ.L
-
Real Estate
FDNU.L
-
XLKQ.L
-
Utilities
FDNU.L
-
XLKQ.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDNU.L vs. XLKQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
FDNU.L
XLKQ.L
FDNU.L vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (FDNU.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDNU.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.44 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.49 | 3.14 | -2.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.23 | 9.57 | -8.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDNU.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 | 2.69 | -2.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 1.09 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 1.17 | -0.83 |
Drawdowns
FDNU.L vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDNU.L drawdown since its inception was -54.01%, which is greater than XLKQ.L's maximum drawdown of -35.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDNU.L and XLKQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDNU.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.01% | -35.00% | -19.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.57% | -16.81% | -3.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.76% | -26.96% | +1.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.01% | -35.00% | -19.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.24% | -3.14% | +0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.23% | -5.75% | -10.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.27% | 5.53% | +2.74% |
Volatility
FDNU.L vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (FDNU.L) is 5.89%, while Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that FDNU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLKQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDNU.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.89% | 6.83% | -0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.23% | 14.92% | +0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.49% | 19.61% | -0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.10% | 23.32% | +2.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.91% | 22.22% | +3.69% |
FDNU.L vs. XLKQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDNU.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDNU.L vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FDNU.L nor XLKQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FDNU.L and XLKQ.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLKQ.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLKQ.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for FDNU.L.
FDNU.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FDNU.L and 0.14% for XLKQ.L.
Find the right allocation for FDNU.L and XLKQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer