PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDNU.L vs. SMGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDNU.L vs. SMGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (FDNU.L) and VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FDNU.L is traded in USD, while SMGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SMGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDNU.L achieves a 4.34% return, which is significantly lower than SMGB.L's 85.03% return.


FDNU.L

1D
0.72%
1M
5.40%
YTD
4.34%
6M
4.66%
1Y
10.19%
3Y*
20.73%
5Y*
4.29%
10Y*

SMGB.L

1D
-2.44%
1M
22.44%
YTD
85.03%
6M
86.05%
1Y
171.14%
3Y*
61.20%
5Y*
36.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDNU.L vs. SMGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FDNU.L
First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD
4.34%9.74%30.52%54.50%-46.64%7.05%2.49%
SMGB.L
VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF
85.03%49.26%24.20%74.93%-35.24%43.10%3.92%

Correlation

The correlation between FDNU.L and SMGB.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2020

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between FDNU.L and SMGB.L has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FDNU.L vs. SMGB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDNU.L
SMGB.L

Technology

37.7%
100.0%

Communication Services

29.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

27.7%

-

Financial Services

2.4%

-

Industrials

1.4%

-

Healthcare

1.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

FDNU.L
37.7%
SMGB.L
100.0%

Communication Services

FDNU.L
29.8%
SMGB.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

FDNU.L
27.7%
SMGB.L

-

Financial Services

FDNU.L
2.4%
SMGB.L

-

Industrials

FDNU.L
1.4%
SMGB.L

-

Healthcare

FDNU.L
1.1%
SMGB.L

-

Basic Materials

FDNU.L

-

SMGB.L

-

Consumer Defensive

FDNU.L

-

SMGB.L

-

Energy

FDNU.L

-

SMGB.L

-

Real Estate

FDNU.L

-

SMGB.L

-

Utilities

FDNU.L

-

SMGB.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDNU.L vs. SMGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDNU.L
FDNU.L Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
FDNU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDNU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDNU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FDNU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDNU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

SMGB.L
SMGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SMGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SMGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDNU.L vs. SMGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (FDNU.L) and VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDNU.LSMGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.70

-0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

12.00

-11.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.23

44.83

-43.60

FDNU.L vs. SMGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDNU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the SMGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 5.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDNU.L and SMGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDNU.LSMGB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

5.32

-4.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

1.15

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

1.18

-0.84

Drawdowns

FDNU.L vs. SMGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDNU.L drawdown since its inception was -54.01%, which is greater than SMGB.L's maximum drawdown of -45.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDNU.L and SMGB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDNU.LSMGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.01%

-45.71%

-8.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.57%

-14.18%

-6.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.76%

-36.86%

+11.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.01%

-45.71%

-8.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.24%

-2.44%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.23%

-11.23%

-5.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.27%

3.80%

+4.47%

Volatility

FDNU.L vs. SMGB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (FDNU.L) is 5.89%, while VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L) has a volatility of 12.88%. This indicates that FDNU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDNU.LSMGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.89%

12.88%

-6.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.23%

25.13%

-9.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.49%

32.00%

-12.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.10%

32.13%

-6.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.91%

31.85%

-5.94%

FDNU.L vs. SMGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDNU.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SMGB.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDNU.L vs. SMGB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FDNU.L nor SMGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
FDNU.L
First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMGB.L
VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDNU.L and SMGB.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SMGB.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SMGB.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for FDNU.L.

FDNU.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while SMGB.L is Semiconductors. Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FDNU.L and 0.35% for SMGB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDNU.L and SMGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer