FDNU.L vs. FBT.L
FDNU.L (First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD) and FBT.L (First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - FDNU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while FBT.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Biotechnology TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDNU.L returned 4.29%/yr vs 6.96%/yr for FBT.L. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FDNU.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FBT.L.
Performance
FDNU.L vs. FBT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FDNU.L is traded in USD, while FBT.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FBT.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDNU.L achieves a 4.34% return, which is significantly lower than FBT.L's 8.70% return.
FDNU.L
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 5.40%
- YTD
- 4.34%
- 6M
- 4.66%
- 1Y
- 10.19%
- 3Y*
- 20.73%
- 5Y*
- 4.29%
- 10Y*
- —
FBT.L
- 1D
- 4.42%
- 1M
- 9.49%
- YTD
- 8.70%
- 6M
- 7.12%
- 1Y
- 38.32%
- 3Y*
- 13.20%
- 5Y*
- 6.96%
- 10Y*
- —
FDNU.L vs. FBT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDNU.L First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD | 4.34% | 9.74% | 30.52% | 54.50% | -46.64% | 7.05% | 31.48% |
FBT.L First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Acc | 8.70% | 25.50% | 5.77% | 4.91% | -7.76% | -3.45% | 5.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDNU.L and FBT.L is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2020 | 0.34 |
The correlation between FDNU.L and FBT.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (3 years) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FDNU.L vs. FBT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDNU.L
FBT.L
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
FDNU.L
FBT.L
-
Communication Services
FDNU.L
FBT.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
FDNU.L
FBT.L
-
Financial Services
FDNU.L
FBT.L
-
Industrials
FDNU.L
FBT.L
-
Healthcare
FDNU.L
FBT.L
Basic Materials
FDNU.L
-
FBT.L
-
Consumer Defensive
FDNU.L
-
FBT.L
-
Energy
FDNU.L
-
FBT.L
-
Real Estate
FDNU.L
-
FBT.L
-
Utilities
FDNU.L
-
FBT.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDNU.L vs. FBT.L — Risk / Return Rank
FDNU.L
FBT.L
FDNU.L vs. FBT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (FDNU.L) and First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Acc (FBT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDNU.L | FBT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.31 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.49 | 2.64 | -2.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.23 | 7.17 | -5.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDNU.L | FBT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 | 1.81 | -1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.40 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.35 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
FDNU.L vs. FBT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDNU.L drawdown since its inception was -54.01%, which is greater than FBT.L's maximum drawdown of -33.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDNU.L and FBT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDNU.L | FBT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.01% | -33.79% | -20.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.57% | -14.43% | -6.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.76% | -20.15% | -5.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.01% | -29.92% | -24.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.24% | 0.00% | -2.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.23% | -12.69% | -3.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.27% | 5.33% | +2.94% |
Volatility
FDNU.L vs. FBT.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (FDNU.L) is 5.89%, while First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Acc (FBT.L) has a volatility of 7.09%. This indicates that FDNU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDNU.L | FBT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.89% | 7.09% | -1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.23% | 16.26% | -1.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.49% | 21.10% | -1.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.10% | 24.31% | +1.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.91% | 25.46% | +0.45% |
FDNU.L vs. FBT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDNU.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FBT.L's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDNU.L vs. FBT.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FDNU.L nor FBT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FDNU.L and FBT.L have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FDNU.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FDNU.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FBT.L.
FDNU.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while FBT.L is Health & Biotech Equities. FDNU.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while FBT.L tracks NASDAQ Biotechnology TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FDNU.L and 0.60% for FBT.L.
Find the right allocation for FDNU.L and FBT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer