PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDNI.L vs. QCLN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDNI.L vs. QCLN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF Class A USD (FDNI.L) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc (QCLN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDNI.L achieves a -19.01% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN.L's 21.50% return.


FDNI.L

1D
0.22%
1M
2.11%
6M
-21.40%
YTD
-19.01%
1Y
-16.52%
3Y*
4.18%
5Y*
-8.22%
10Y*

QCLN.L

1D
-1.83%
1M
-13.67%
6M
11.15%
YTD
21.50%
1Y
57.29%
3Y*
-1.15%
5Y*
-2.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDNI.L vs. QCLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDNI.L
First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF Class A USD
-19.01%17.62%24.52%-3.10%-31.88%6,246.96%4.74%23.78%-14.65%17.66%
QCLN.L
First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc
21.50%20.09%-17.94%-12.66%-23.26%6,519.75%18.79%20.49%-10.68%14.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FDNI.L and QCLN.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2017

0.51

The correlation between FDNI.L and QCLN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDNI.L vs. QCLN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDNI.L
FDNI.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FDNI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDNI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDNI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FDNI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDNI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

QCLN.L
QCLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
QCLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
QCLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDNI.L vs. QCLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF Class A USD (FDNI.L) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc (QCLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDNI.LQCLN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.24

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.45

2.63

-3.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.79

8.83

-9.63

FDNI.L vs. QCLN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDNI.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.75, which is lower than the QCLN.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDNI.L and QCLN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDNI.L vs. QCLN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDNI.L drawdown since its inception was -64.63%, smaller than the maximum QCLN.L drawdown of -69.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDNI.L and QCLN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDNI.LQCLN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.63%

-69.87%

+5.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.98%

-21.65%

-14.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.98%

-56.66%

+20.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.60%

-68.64%

+12.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.79%

-36.39%

-11.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.64%

-27.61%

-0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.58%

6.47%

+14.11%

Volatility

FDNI.L vs. QCLN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF Class A USD (FDNI.L) is 5.45%, while First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc (QCLN.L) has a volatility of 16.69%. This indicates that FDNI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDNI.LQCLN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.45%

16.69%

-11.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.16%

30.08%

-12.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.67%

38.16%

-16.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.25%

38.68%

-5.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2,375.51%

2,359.88%

+15.63%

Dividends

FDNI.L vs. QCLN.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FDNI.L nor QCLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FDNI.L and QCLN.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDNI.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while QCLN.L is Energy Equities. FDNI.L tracks First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF Class A USD, while QCLN.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDNI.L and QCLN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer