FDND vs. LQTI

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FDND (FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDND is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by FT Vest, while LQTI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by FT Vest. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FDND returned 1.61% vs 1.01% for LQTI. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FDND charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.

Performance

FDND vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDND achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly higher than LQTI's -1.60% return.

FDND

• 1D: 2.22%
• 1M: 2.80%
• 6M: 3.79%
• YTD: 0.56%
• 1Y: 1.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.95%

LQTI

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: -2.24%
• 6M: -1.58%
• YTD: -1.60%
• 1Y: 1.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FDND FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF	$52.86K	$42.66K	$64.39K
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	$2.40M	$2.20M	$1.68M

FDND vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FDND FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF	0.56%	1.34%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	-1.60%	6.59%

Correlation

The correlation between FDND and LQTI is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025	0.20

Return for Risk

FDND vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDND

FDND Risk / Return Rank: 9
FDND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
FDND Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
FDND Omega Ratio Rank: 9
FDND Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
FDND Martin Ratio Rank: 10

LQTI

LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 18
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 16
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDND vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDND	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.08	0.35	-0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.02	0.52	-0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.06	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.08	0.53	-0.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.18	1.35	-1.52

FDND vs. LQTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDND Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is lower than the LQTI Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDND and LQTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDND vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDND drawdown since its inception was -24.12%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDND and LQTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDND	LQTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.12%	-3.41%	-20.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.49%	-3.41%	-17.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.97%	-3.17%	-2.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.84%	-0.98%	-4.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.05%	1.34%	+7.71%

Volatility

FDND vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND) has a higher volatility of 5.55% compared to FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) at 1.44%. This indicates that FDND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDND	LQTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.55%	1.44%	+4.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.62%	4.14%	+11.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.58%	5.19%	+14.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.40%	5.90%	+15.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.40%	5.90%	+15.50%

FDND vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDND has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDND vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison

FDND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.09%, less than LQTI's 9.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FDND FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF	8.09%	8.11%	5.51%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	8.54%	7.01%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDND and LQTI in my portfolio?

FDND and LQTI have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDND or LQTI?

FDND has higher volatility (5.55%) compared to LQTI (1.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDND dropped -24.12% vs LQTI's -3.41%.

Which ETF is better, FDND or LQTI?

On 1-year performance, FDND leads with 1.61% vs 1.01% for LQTI. On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, LQTI has been the lower-risk option at 1.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDND or LQTI?

Over the 1-year period, FDND has performed better with a 1.61% return vs 1.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDND or LQTI?

LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FDND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDND or LQTI?

LQTI has the higher dividend yield at 8.54%, compared with 8.09% for FDND.

What is the main difference between FDND and LQTI?

FDND is categorized as Technology Equities, while LQTI is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FDND and 0.65% for LQTI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LQTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.35 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.