FDND vs. CHPS
FDND (FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDND is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by FT Vest, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. FDND is actively managed, while CHPS is passively managed. Over the past year, FDND returned 7.37% vs 223.67% for CHPS. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FDND charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.
Performance
FDND vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDND achieves a 2.42% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 107.97% return.
FDND
- 1D
- -1.99%
- 1M
- 3.57%
- YTD
- 2.42%
- 6M
- 1.71%
- 1Y
- 7.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHPS
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- 32.32%
- YTD
- 107.97%
- 6M
- 109.04%
- 1Y
- 223.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDND vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FDND FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF | 2.42% | 9.69% | 15.85% |
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 107.97% | 58.47% | -7.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDND and CHPS is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2024 | 0.50 |
The correlation between FDND and CHPS shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDND vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank
FDND
CHPS
FDND vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDND | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.81 | -0.73 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | 12.87 | -12.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.88 | 49.99 | -49.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDND | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | 6.54 | -6.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 1.81 | -1.21 |
Drawdowns
FDND vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDND drawdown since its inception was -24.12%, smaller than the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDND and CHPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDND | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.12% | -39.44% | +15.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.49% | -17.50% | -2.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.24% | 0.00% | -4.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.67% | -9.16% | +3.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.39% | 4.50% | +3.89% |
Volatility
FDND vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND) is 5.29%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 14.18%. This indicates that FDND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDND | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.29% | 14.18% | -8.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.07% | 28.19% | -14.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.28% | 34.43% | -16.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.40% | 33.78% | -12.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.40% | 33.78% | -12.38% |
FDND vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDND has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDND vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison
FDND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.98%, more than CHPS's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 0.32% | 0.68% | 1.75% | 0.36% |
FDND FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF | 7.98% | 8.11% | 5.51% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDND and CHPS have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHPS has higher volatility (14.18%) compared to FDND (5.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDND dropped -24.12% vs CHPS's -39.44%.
On 1-year performance, CHPS leads with 223.67% vs 7.37% for FDND. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FDND has been the lower-risk option at 5.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 223.67% return vs 7.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FDND.
FDND has the higher dividend yield at 7.98%, compared with 0.32% for CHPS.
FDND is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FDND and 0.15% for CHPS.
CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.54 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDND and CHPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer