PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDN.L vs. VPNG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDN.L vs. VPNG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (FDN.L) and Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VPNG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FDN.L is traded in GBp, while VPNG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VPNG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDN.L achieves a 4.53% return, which is significantly lower than VPNG.L's 50.78% return.


FDN.L

1D
0.72%
1M
6.42%
YTD
4.53%
6M
3.88%
1Y
11.30%
3Y*
17.62%
5Y*
5.41%
10Y*

VPNG.L

1D
-1.94%
1M
10.12%
YTD
50.78%
6M
51.37%
1Y
81.99%
3Y*
31.82%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDN.L vs. VPNG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FDN.L
First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD
4.53%2.35%32.65%45.94%-40.28%-3.57%
VPNG.L
Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
50.78%20.65%15.20%11.28%-22.08%1.80%

Correlation

The correlation between FDN.L and VPNG.L is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2021

0.51

The correlation between FDN.L and VPNG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDN.L vs. VPNG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDN.L
FDN.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FDN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FDN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

VPNG.L
VPNG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
VPNG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPNG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPNG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
VPNG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPNG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDN.L vs. VPNG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (FDN.L) and Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VPNG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDN.LVPNG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.58

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

5.73

-5.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.24

19.68

-18.43

FDN.L vs. VPNG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDN.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the VPNG.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDN.L and VPNG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDN.LVPNG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

3.66

-3.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.71

-0.36

Drawdowns

FDN.L vs. VPNG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDN.L drawdown since its inception was -46.90%, which is greater than VPNG.L's maximum drawdown of -26.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDN.L and VPNG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDN.LVPNG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.90%

-26.74%

-20.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.87%

-14.22%

-6.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.22%

-26.74%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.70%

-1.94%

-0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.80%

-11.45%

-3.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.07%

4.15%

+4.92%

Volatility

FDN.L vs. VPNG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (FDN.L) is 5.75%, while Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VPNG.L) has a volatility of 6.89%. This indicates that FDN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VPNG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDN.LVPNG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.75%

6.89%

-1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.20%

16.34%

-2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.40%

22.38%

-3.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.41%

20.73%

+3.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.51%

20.73%

+3.78%

FDN.L vs. VPNG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDN.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than VPNG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDN.L vs. VPNG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FDN.L nor VPNG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FDN.L and VPNG.L have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VPNG.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VPNG.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for FDN.L.

FDN.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while VPNG.L tracks Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FDN.L and 0.50% for VPNG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDN.L and VPNG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer