FDN.L vs. FOGB.L
FDN.L (First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD) and FOGB.L (Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD) are both Technology Equities funds - FDN.L tracks the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD while FOGB.L tracks the Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDN.L returned 3.25%/yr vs -8.73%/yr for FOGB.L. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FDN.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FOGB.L.
Performance
FDN.L vs. FOGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDN.L achieves a 1.96% return, which is significantly lower than FOGB.L's 3.33% return.
FDN.L
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- 6M
- 4.30%
- YTD
- 1.96%
- 1Y
- 3.03%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 3.25%
- 10Y*
- —
FOGB.L
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- 6M
- -1.77%
- YTD
- 3.33%
- 1Y
- -4.66%
- 3Y*
- -5.08%
- 5Y*
- -8.73%
- 10Y*
- —
FDN.L vs. FOGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDN.L First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD | 1.96% | 2.35% | 32.65% | 45.94% | -40.28% | 8.39% | 1.97% |
FOGB.L Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD | 3.33% | -9.49% | -5.72% | -6.98% | -18.26% | 2.56% | 9.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDN.L and FOGB.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020 | 0.45 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FDN.L and FOGB.L has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDN.L vs. FOGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
FDN.L
FOGB.L
FDN.L vs. FOGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (FDN.L) and Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDN.L | FOGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 0.98 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.14 | -0.25 | +0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.32 | -0.41 | +0.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDN.L vs. FOGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDN.L drawdown since its inception was -46.90%, which is greater than FOGB.L's maximum drawdown of -43.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDN.L and FOGB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDN.L | FOGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.90% | -43.46% | -3.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.87% | -12.73% | -8.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.22% | -23.44% | -3.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.90% | -43.46% | -3.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.08% | -38.99% | +33.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.59% | -24.51% | +6.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.40% | 7.79% | +1.61% |
Volatility
FDN.L vs. FOGB.L - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Dow Jones Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (FDN.L) has a higher volatility of 7.52% compared to Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOGB.L) at 4.25%. This indicates that FDN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FOGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDN.L | FOGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.52% | 4.25% | +3.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.04% | 11.01% | +5.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.88% | 15.10% | +4.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.94% | 15.83% | +12.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.97% | 15.43% | +12.54% |
FDN.L vs. FOGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDN.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FOGB.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDN.L vs. FOGB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FDN.L nor FOGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FDN.L and FOGB.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FOGB.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FOGB.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for FDN.L.
FDN.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while FOGB.L tracks Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Rize ETF. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FDN.L and 0.45% for FOGB.L.
Find the right allocation for FDN.L and FOGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer