FDMO vs. FCMO.NEO
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) and Fidelity US Momentum ETF (FCMO.NEO).
FDMO and FCMO.NEO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FDMO is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity U.S. Momentum Factor Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2016. FCMO.NEO is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity Canada U.S. Momentum Index. It was launched on Jun 5, 2020. Both FDMO and FCMO.NEO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FDMO vs. FCMO.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDMO vs. FCMO.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FDMO Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF | -3.41% | 21.43% | 16.51% |
FCMO.NEO Fidelity US Momentum ETF | -0.24% | 19.53% | 19.46% |
Different Trading Currencies
FDMO is traded in USD, while FCMO.NEO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the FCMO.NEO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDMO achieves a -3.41% return, which is significantly lower than FCMO.NEO's -0.24% return.
FDMO
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- -3.65%
- YTD
- -3.41%
- 6M
- -2.16%
- 1Y
- 24.32%
- 3Y*
- 22.93%
- 5Y*
- 13.24%
- 10Y*
- —
FCMO.NEO
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- -5.53%
- YTD
- -0.24%
- 6M
- 0.05%
- 1Y
- 23.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDMO vs. FCMO.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDMO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FCMO.NEO's 0.38% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDMO vs. FCMO.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
FDMO
FCMO.NEO
FDMO vs. FCMO.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) and Fidelity US Momentum ETF (FCMO.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDMO | FCMO.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.10 | 0.95 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.66 | 1.48 | +0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.21 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 1.76 | +0.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.46 | 7.23 | +0.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDMO | FCMO.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 0.95 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.92 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDMO and FCMO.NEO is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FDMO vs. FCMO.NEO - Dividend Comparison
FDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, more than FCMO.NEO's 0.36% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDMO Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF | 0.66% | 0.61% | 0.90% | 0.87% | 1.19% | 0.60% | 0.77% | 1.23% | 1.22% | 1.09% | 0.45% |
FCMO.NEO Fidelity US Momentum ETF | 0.36% | 0.36% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FDMO vs. FCMO.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDMO drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, which is greater than FCMO.NEO's maximum drawdown of -21.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDMO and FCMO.NEO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDMO | FCMO.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.94% | -21.77% | -12.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.33% | -13.90% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.73% | -5.35% | -2.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.49% | -3.12% | -2.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.39% | 3.97% | -0.58% |
Volatility
FDMO vs. FCMO.NEO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) is 7.55%, while Fidelity US Momentum ETF (FCMO.NEO) has a volatility of 9.04%. This indicates that FDMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCMO.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDMO | FCMO.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.55% | 9.04% | -1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.66% | 15.06% | -1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.24% | 24.51% | -2.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.98% | 21.16% | -2.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.55% | 21.16% | -1.61% |